Español Français Deutsch Italiano Nederlands Svenska Dansk Japanese Chinese (Simplified) Russian
 
AVForums.com twitter AVForums is a member of CEDIA. THX certified reviewer.  Click for more information. AVForums reviewers are ISF Certified.  Click for more information.
 
The UK's biggest and best home entertainment electronics forums  
4 million visitors each month


Forums Register Blogs Information Social Groups Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   AVForums.com > Home Electronics > Digital Photography General Chat

Today's price checkPowered by
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ7 Black
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ38 Black
Canon EOS 450D Black
Canon PowerShot A480 Silver
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ7 Black 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ38 Black 
Canon EOS 450D Black 
Canon PowerShot A480 Silver 
Canon EOS 500D Black + 18-55mm Lens Kit 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 Black 
Canon EOS 500D Black 
Canon EOS 1000D Black + 18-55mm Lens ... 
Canon Digital IXUS 100 IS Silver 
Nikon D90 Black 
 More...Prices updated November 24th at 11:30pm and include delivery.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15-12-2004, 5:39 PM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Renfrew
Posts: 321
Thanks: Gave 5, Got 12
Questions from a novice.

I bought a digital camera not long ago and have been messing around trying to find out how to use the damn thing. Im not looking for a crash course in digital photography but perhaps someone can explain a few things for me.
My wife took some pictures on cd to the local photo shop to get some pictures put into frames photo #1 was taken on the super fine setting at 1200X1600 and was 1.08MB in size photo #2 also in super fine at 1024x768 and 407kb in size.

#1 was printed 8"x6"
#2 was printed 7"x5"

#2 was of a far superior quality to #1 which was quite poor. I'd just like to know why this is, cause I thought the bigger the image size was taken the better the quality would be. Or am I getting it the wrong way round.

Many thanks in advance.
__________________
You think you've got lag?? It took Jesus three days to respawn!!
Mad Mikeyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2004, 6:22 PM   #2 (permalink)
Ex Member
 
seany's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Manchester city
Posts: 2,784
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Well how does the original look on screen? When you saved it to the disc it might have been compressed which would cause a loss in quality
seany is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2004, 6:28 PM   #3 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Renfrew
Posts: 321
Thanks: Gave 5, Got 12
Looks "grainy" on screen too, not too hot.
__________________
You think you've got lag?? It took Jesus three days to respawn!!
Mad Mikeyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2004, 6:32 PM   #4 (permalink)
Ex Member
 
seany's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Manchester city
Posts: 2,784
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
That's just part taking photo's. Lighting, movement while taking a photo and many other things can spoil a photo. No matter what mp your photo is or camera for that matter. Grainy normally means that the iso is too high.

Mp does not have much to do with quality. If you take a poor shot, a high mp won't make a jot

Last edited by seany; 15-12-2004 at 6:35 PM.
seany is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2004, 6:35 PM   #5 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Renfrew
Posts: 321
Thanks: Gave 5, Got 12
Excuse the ignorance again , what's iso?

I've checked and when in manual mode it's set at 400. I know I should probably read the manual but I'm lazy what can I say.
__________________
You think you've got lag?? It took Jesus three days to respawn!!

Last edited by Mad Mikeyboy; 15-12-2004 at 6:39 PM.
Mad Mikeyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2004, 6:40 PM   #6 (permalink)
Ex Member
 
seany's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Manchester city
Posts: 2,784
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
http://www.dpreview.com/learn/?/Glos...itivity_01.htm tell's you all about it there.

Best advice i can give you to keep it simple until you learn more about your cam settings... If it looks good on screen it should make a good print. better to take photos at a large size so you can toy about with them
seany is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2004, 8:44 PM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Renfrew
Posts: 321
Thanks: Gave 5, Got 12
That seems to be it, at least I know what that means now. I was experimenting with the manual settings and I think I forgot to change the iso setting back to auto.Thanks.
__________________
You think you've got lag?? It took Jesus three days to respawn!!
Mad Mikeyboy is offline   Reply With Quote



Bookmarks

Tags
novice, questions
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:41 PM.

AV Forums
Optimised for Firefox.
RSS Feed
AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited.
Copyright © 2000-2009 M2N E. & O. E.
Global Gold
Web Hosting