AVForums.com is the UK's biggest & best home consumer electronics discussion resource New to AVForums.com? Start by reading our introduction here.


Go Back   AVForums.com > Home Electronics > Digital Cameras, Photography and Photo Editing

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17-07-2007, 2:24 PM   #1 (permalink)
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 438
iTrader: (0)
Thanks: Gave 74, Got 145
Arctic Butterfly

Does any one use an arctic butterfly to clean there sensor. I was thinking of getting one and happened to notice that "Digital Photo" and "Practical Photography" are currently giving one away (Sl700 version, worth about £45) with there current subscription offer. See http://www.greatmagazines.co.uk/stor...re.asp?sid=322

Apart from general news and kit reviews, would I be right in saying that Digital Photo is more to do with editing (hence the free CD with lessons), and Practical Photography more to do with the taking of photos.

Ian.
__________________
Canon 400D, 18-55 Kit Lens, Sigma 70-300 APO & 10-20mm.
flickr
iandrews is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2007, 3:06 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
chrisgeary's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bracknell / Basingstoke
Posts: 1,544
iTrader: (31)
Thanks: Gave 42, Got 71
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Arctic Butterfly

unless you are very very good at keeping the bristles free from dirt and grease, i would recommend a rocket blower instead. touching the sensor with anything is to be treated as an absolute last resort. i speak from experience having owned an arctic butterfly (its really not that great at picking up dust anyway) and getting it dirty and then spreading that dirt.
__________________
Chris Geary
AV: SB2, 9200T, PCH A-100 | Lexicon MC-1 | Roksan Caspian AV5 | B&W 705s/LCR600/LM1s | SVS 20-39PC+
Portable: iPhone | Sennheiser PXC-450
Photography: www.christophergeary.co.uk - Canon 30D | Sigma 10-20 | EF-S 60/2.8 | EF 70-200/4L | 430EX
chrisgeary is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2007, 3:32 PM   #3 (permalink)
Prominent Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London, centre of the universe
Posts: 3,210
iTrader: (2)
Thanks: Gave 43, Got 173
Re: Arctic Butterfly

I agree and disagree with Chris.
I agree that it can also make things worse. my first one had bristles sticking out and i somehow managed to get grease or oil on the filter (thats what you clean, not the sensor itself) because they touched the sides as i was putting it in.
The second one i have is ok.

I disagree that a rocket blower is better. I have one and it would not dislodge a few dust spots, thats why i got the AB. But even that wont shift everything and i have also had to get a wet cleaning kit to remove the stubborn bits.
It is safer though.

Now i use the AB with care and it is a nice quick fix if im in a hurry.

But it is very, very overpriced IMO.
__________________
Dave
Gallery@
http://davepearce.smugmug.com
Canon 40D | 17-55IS F/2.8 | 24-105L F/4 IS | 35mm F/2 |50mm F/1.4 | 85mm F/1.8

Last edited by dave_bass5; 17-07-2007 at 3:36 PM.
dave_bass5 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 18-07-2007, 7:17 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
h4rri's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,745
iTrader: (15)
Thanks: Gave 37, Got 174
Re: Arctic Butterfly

DP is worth the money, I subscribed when they had the reflector on offer as that was more use to me [despite having not used it yet ] But I agree with DB5 that the Arctic Butterfly is seriously overpriced for what it is, I mean £45 for a whizzy brush
__________________
w: www.randomphotos.net

#: Canon 1D Mk III - Bunch of Lenses. Bag full of other stuff :#
h4rri is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18-07-2007, 8:27 AM   #5 (permalink)
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hillingdon /Hayes, Middx
Posts: 10,888
iTrader: (0)
Thanks: Gave 284, Got 1,491
Re: Arctic Butterfly

Not used the AB ( was thinking of it lately) so Im not sure about it but Im sure those who wonder about VFM are right
I found that I needed 4 -5 attempts with the rocket blower before I could shift a particularly stubborn dust bunny..each time shooting a white card to test!!!
You may never notice them till you shoot the sky!

But it is OK ..for now
Moral..( for me at least) all methods are Ok within limitations the riskiest but by far most effective is the wet method

DP is IMHO worth subscribing to ... Considering I don't think I've missed an episode in the last 2 years.. its about time I subscribed .....I think..

It covers, Kit, technique and PP.. It doesn't do all in the same depth and breath but Ive never found one issue where I didn't get to learn something useful. and the CDs are valuable for learning pretty painlessly
__________________
S3Stuff


Opinions expressed by myself are not necessarily those of AV Forums..or even mine!

Last edited by senu; 18-07-2007 at 10:19 AM.
senu is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18-07-2007, 10:16 AM   #6 (permalink)
Prominent Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London, centre of the universe
Posts: 3,210
iTrader: (2)
Thanks: Gave 43, Got 173
Re: Arctic Butterfly

Quote:
Originally Posted by h4rri View Post
But I agree with DB5 that the Arctic Butterfly is seriously overpriced for what it is, I mean £45 for a whizzy brush
And im talking about the AB 724 which at the time was £69
__________________
Dave
Gallery@
http://davepearce.smugmug.com
Canon 40D | 17-55IS F/2.8 | 24-105L F/4 IS | 35mm F/2 |50mm F/1.4 | 85mm F/1.8
dave_bass5 is online now  
Reply With Quote

Bookmarks

Tags
arctic, butterfly


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:37 PM.

AV ForumsOptimised for Firefox.
RSS Feed
AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited.
Copyright © 2000-2008 M2N E. & O. E.
Global Gold
Web Hosting