Español Français Deutsch Italiano Nederlands Svenska Dansk Japanese Chinese (Simplified) Russian
 
AVForums.com twitter AVForums is a member of CEDIA. THX certified reviewer.  Click for more information. AVForums reviewers are ISF Certified.  Click for more information.
 
The UK's biggest and best home entertainment electronics forums  
4 million visitors each month


Forums Register Blogs Information Social Groups Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   AVForums.com > Video Electronics > CRT Televisions

Latest AVForums Movie Reviews
Terminator Salvation Blu-ray ReviewGray Lady Down - Original Motion Picture Soundtrack CD ReviewUp Blu-ray ReviewLéon Blu-ray ReviewNear Dark Blu-ray Review
Logan's Run Blu-ray ReviewTaking of Pelham 1 2 3, The Blu-ray ReviewStar Trek Blu-ray ReviewUFC 100: Lesnar vs. Mir (2009) Blu-ray ReviewThe New York Ripper Blu-ray Review


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-05-2006, 8:48 PM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Leeds
Posts: 468
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 7
CVBS vs RGB

Hi

My TV (Panasonic TX-28PB50) dosent seem to like RGB.

If I set it to CVBS this seems ok, it looks like a good picture to my old eyes. But on the scale componant> RGB>S-video>composite.

Where does CVBS come on this scale, and what does it mean in laymans terms.

Just bought a Packard Bell HDD/DVDR, seems ok so far.

Nigel
nig28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2006, 10:25 PM   #2 (permalink)
Prominent Member
 
Chris Muriel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 4,117
Thanks: Gave 186, Got 379
Comes bottom of the scale.

Cvbs = Composite Video Blanking and Syncs.
S-video is next - the colour part is sent separately from the luminance.
Then RGB (best of the 3 ) - where the colours are sent separately.

Chris Muriel, Manchester
Chris Muriel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 8:33 AM   #3 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 568
Thanks: Gave 5, Got 9
yup ill agree RGB is the best....
ismael-1986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 4:13 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,262
Thanks: Gave 40, Got 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by ismael-1986
yup ill agree RGB is the best....
after component
Eiji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 11:52 AM   #5 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 568
Thanks: Gave 5, Got 9
HEHE well ok....
ismael-1986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2006, 9:33 PM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 251
Thanks: Gave 16, Got 10
I have noticed with TVs with component input the RGB doesn't seem quite as good through a scart as it is when an RGB enabled scart is the best option you have. I swear the RGB on my sammy isn't as good as my old CRT was however P Scan blows it clear away.
Kirby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-05-2006, 7:52 AM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 553
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 5
I see the old chestnut about the differences between of quality between 'component' (YUV) and RGB. In fact these days there is no difference. In the tv production centre all the equipment works on a digital format called SDI - this is a digital form of component (YUV) - the Y part being a full bandwidth 5.5MHz signal and the U&V signals being around half that bandwidth.

The only bit of kit at production centre that might still conceivably work in full bandwidth RGB is the actual tv camera but even then the RGB signals leaving the camera head are swiftly converted to SDI (ie, YUV).

So, the tv pictures that end up being received by your tv at home (no matter what the transmission method) will 'only' be to YUV quality and not RGB. Your domestic telly might well convert these decoded analogue YUV signals to RGB - but nothing is gained by it since the incoming signals have been bandwidth limited before they ever got to your telly (I suppose a crt requires RGB feeds to drive it but that is a matter of convenience rather than a design 'feature').

Having said that YUV pictures are of course a great deal better than composite of course! Regards, yt.
red16v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2006, 2:11 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,192
Thanks: Gave 82, Got 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by red16v
I see the old chestnut about the differences between of quality between 'component' (YUV) and RGB. In fact these days there is no difference.
Your analysis does not cover DVD input, does it?
aekostas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2006, 8:29 PM   #9 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 553
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 5
Hi,
I must admit I did not consider DVD. However, the signal recorded on DVDs is mpeg(?). I suppose one would have to think about what are the basic constituent signals being fed to the encoder - hopefully there may be someone on the forum with some deeper knowledge of this and may be able to give a definitive answer - I suspect it too might be that the source signals are YUV - I'll be very interested in any informed replies. Regards, yt.
red16v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2006, 11:48 AM   #10 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,033
Thanks: Gave 8, Got 501
DVD is native YCrCb digital 4:2:0 MPEG2 on disc, just as digital TV is 4:2:0 YCrCb MPEG2 broadcast.

Digital TV is usually sourced from 4:2:2 YCrCb SDI infrastructure (though some VTRs are 4:1:1 or 4:2:0) and as others have posted the only RGB origination is in-camera, in-telecine and some graphics devices, all of which are swiftly converted to YCrCb for carriage over SDI.

Most DVDs will also be sourced from 4:2:2 SDI sources - like a VTR or a Telecine - however some may be from HD-SDI 4:2:2 YCrCb sources and down converted as part of the mastering, and some may even be 4:4:4 RGB sourced from a film scan.

There are penalties from multiple colour space conversions between RGB and YCrCb, but there should be little obvious difference at the receiver between RGB and YCrCb (digital) / YPrPb (analogue) interconnects - and most displays end up in RGB for screen driving so the conversion has to take place somewhere.

(NB YUV is not technically the correct terminology for digital or analogue component signals - it refers specifically to the weighted colour difference signals within a PAL encoder/decoder, just as YIQ refers to the rotated colour difference signals in NTSC gear. Better to refer to digital component as YCrCb and analogue component as YPrPb if you want to be clear about what signals you are referring to)
Stephen Neal is offline   Reply With Quote



Bookmarks

Tags
cvbs, rgb
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:36 AM.

AV Forums
Optimised for Firefox.
RSS Feed
AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited.
Copyright © 2000-2009 M2N E. & O. E.
Global Gold
Web Hosting