Español Français Deutsch Italiano Nederlands Svenska Dansk Japanese Chinese (Simplified) Russian
 
AVForums.com twitter AVForums is a member of CEDIA. THX certified reviewer.  Click for more information. AVForums reviewers are ISF Certified.  Click for more information.
 
The UK's biggest and best home entertainment electronics forums  
4 million visitors each month


Forums Register Blogs Information Social Groups Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   AVForums.com > Video Electronics > CRT Televisions

Latest AVForums Movie Reviews
Terminator Salvation Blu-ray ReviewNorth By Northwest (50th Anniversary Edition Blu-ray Book) Blu-ray ReviewScrooge (A Christmas Carol) Blu-ray ReviewGray Lady Down - Original Motion Picture Soundtrack CD ReviewUp Blu-ray Review
Léon Blu-ray ReviewNear Dark Blu-ray ReviewLogan's Run Blu-ray ReviewTaking of Pelham 1 2 3, The Blu-ray ReviewStar Trek Blu-ray Review


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-04-2002, 6:18 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,886
Thanks: Gave 150, Got 23
Viewing Distance

I am buying an new (plasma) TV and cannot decide whether to buy a 37" or 42" display.

I know there is a rough formula for viewing distance to screen size.

Does anyone know what this is ?

Thanks.
Edgeyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2002, 8:49 PM   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
Zacabeb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 474
Thanks: Gave 10, Got 9
Often 6 times the height of the screen (6H) is considered optimal viewing distance. In the case of a 16:9 set this means the diagonal of the screen should be roughly 1/3 of the viewing distance, and in the case of a 4:3 set it should be roughly 1/4.

I used to have a 41", 4:3 RPTV which I viewed at a distance of 3 meters. I kept being told by people (many of whom are no more astute than to ask me for help all the time) that the screen was way too big. They'd say I should stick to a 25" set, referring to the fist vs. screen method.

The fist vs. screen method is very annoying and inaccurate. It simply involves standing at your intended viewing distance, stretching your arm out and covering the screen with your fist. If the fist covers the whole screen, it is of the right size. If part of the screen shows around your fist, the screen is too big.

Since this results in a very small screen for anyone but Popeye and other people with extremely large fists, I consider it useless. I think it's mostly wishful thinking caused by that most people can not afford very big screens. Or it could be that it's been around for way longer than home cinema and widescreen.

Now I have had a 32", 16:9 set for half a year, and I still often feel the screen is too small for stuff such as movies and video games.
__________________
Thank you Wayne Coyne, for thanking Jack White for the fiber-optic Jesus

Last edited by Zacabeb; 03-04-2002 at 8:23 PM.
Zacabeb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2002, 9:28 PM   #3 (permalink)
bh
Member
 
bh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lost (no GPS here)!
Posts: 397
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Quote:
I know there is a rough formula for viewing distance to screen size. Does anyone know what this is ?
2.5 times screen height is another formula that I have heard of. However, your best bet is to audition the screens and see what you thing is comfortable (without seeing the fixel structure that you see close up on plasma screens).
bh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2002, 11:21 PM   #4 (permalink)
Prominent Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Manchester
Posts: 4,408
Thanks: Gave 95, Got 75
There's no scientific formula, just use your own judgemnet.
I have a 42" and sit at 10ft away. My 'guest chair' is 6ft away, no problems with either.

Go for the 42", it isn't as big as it sounds, you'll soon get used to it. I think you'll find 37" a bit small after a while.

Zacabeb

That's how long I lasted with my 32", then I decided to upgrade to 40". Best thing I ever did. 2.35.1 films no longer look like I'm watching on a stretched portable TV!
Kevo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2002, 8:50 AM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Swindon
Posts: 1,314
Thanks: Gave 24, Got 32
I have a 42" plasma, and 2.5m is just about OK. Any closer and pixel structure is visible. 2.5m to 3m is probably optimum.
philipb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2002, 10:21 AM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 514
Thanks: Gave 30, Got 63
There IS a formula. In fact, there are several, but I'll refer to that used for the THX specification:

Quote:
Viewing Angle
The optimum audience viewing angle for the Cinemascope image (2.39:1) from the screen to the farthest seat in the auditorium is 36 degrees with 26 degress as the aceptable minimum.
In order to meet this criterion, viewing distance must be 1.54 to 2.17 times the screen width. If you sit any further, you won't get a "cinema-like experience" (at least, that's what Lucasfilm says). Assuming a 42"-diagonal plasma has a 93cm-wide screen (allow me to use the SI), you should sit at a distance of 1.43 to 2.02 metres.

Note that I'm not addressing pixel structure visibility or screendoor, which is a whole different problem.

Regards.
Grubert is offline   Reply With Quote



Bookmarks

Tags
distance, viewing
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:26 PM.

AV Forums
Optimised for Firefox.
RSS Feed
AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited.
Copyright © 2000-2009 M2N E. & O. E.
Global Gold
Web Hosting