|
Often 6 times the height of the screen (6H) is considered optimal viewing distance. In the case of a 16:9 set this means the diagonal of the screen should be roughly 1/3 of the viewing distance, and in the case of a 4:3 set it should be roughly 1/4.
I used to have a 41", 4:3 RPTV which I viewed at a distance of 3 meters. I kept being told by people (many of whom are no more astute than to ask me for help all the time) that the screen was way too big. They'd say I should stick to a 25" set, referring to the fist vs. screen method.
The fist vs. screen method is very annoying and inaccurate. It simply involves standing at your intended viewing distance, stretching your arm out and covering the screen with your fist. If the fist covers the whole screen, it is of the right size. If part of the screen shows around your fist, the screen is too big.
Since this results in a very small screen for anyone but Popeye and other people with extremely large fists, I consider it useless. I think it's mostly wishful thinking caused by that most people can not afford very big screens. Or it could be that it's been around for way longer than home cinema and widescreen.
Now I have had a 32", 16:9 set for half a year, and I still often feel the screen is too small for stuff such as movies and video games.
__________________ Thank you Wayne Coyne, for thanking Jack White for the fiber-optic Jesus
Last edited by Zacabeb; 03-04-2002 at 8:23 PM.
|