As my questions will demonstrate, I'm terribly ignorant of the finer points of home theatre et al so apologies for that ... anyway, I'm from NZ and am deciding on the purchase of a new TV - it will be used for playing PS2 (and future XBOX) games and for some limited DVD viewing (via Sony DAV-S500 - or is it 550?). Although some PS2 games (& many XBOX) have widescreen options, the vast majority don't - given I wish to maximise my viewing area for game playing, and given that in NZ 16:9 ratio braodcasts are non-existent
AFAIK, I'm inclined to get a 4:3 telly around the 34" mark.
I have a preference for Sony and Panasonic (on no rational basis really other than previous ownership of these brands) and have been particularly looking at 2 Sony Wega tvs - the XA34 and the ES34 - I guess model numbers may be different for us in the colonies so here's the URL to the Sony NZ site showing the spec's on these two tellies (and try not to laugh at the limited range of widescreens heh):
http://www.sony.co.nz/visual/product...sid=1327610752
Anyway, I have become a bit confused about contradictory statements I've read regarding the usefulness of 100HZ, how good is the Sony DRC thing (which I believe sharpens up the picture?) - so it would be hugely appreciated if anyone could look at the specs on the link, and make some comments about these 2 tellies in the context of their utility for PS2 games playing and some limited DVD movie watching (i.e. is 100HZ actually useful for gamesplaying?). And BTW, the PS2 is hooked up to the DVD playing for sound so the sound quality of the telly is not a big concern. There is an obvious large price difference between the two and I'm a bit stuck as to whether there would be a significant picture quality improvement to warrant the additional dosh for the more expensive variant.
So some guidance would be great, cheers ...