 | | |
04-04-2005, 1:10 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 45
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2 | TV Headache
ok, i've been sat infront of my pc all day trying to work out which tv to buy, if buy one at all..... here's my headache......
buy a Tv now....
choice of
toshiba 36zp48
philly 32pw9509
panasonic 32pd50
and various sony's mostly 32dx200
can anyone recommend a set from the above, i've been reading the forum and found peeps have had some serious problems with some if not all of the above sets. i will be using the tv for dvd's and ps2 mostly. so this has been driving me mad trying to choose a set but then after digging deeper......
HDTV
is it worth waiting for this tech to come in (will it cost the earth?, how long will it be?) do i delay my tv purchase or just buy a nice tv one of the above if i can ever work out which or will it be a waste of money due to this new tech just about to appear?
Any help or advice would really help, its 2am now, should really goto sleep! my head hurts lol
Last edited by handers101; 04-04-2005 at 1:20 AM.
|
| |
04-04-2005, 8:26 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: grimsby
Posts: 1,832
Thanks: Gave 103, Got 71 |
i went for the toshiba 36zp48 totally amazing set games looked completely different,i play xbox ps2 gamecube on it dvds are amazing so is the sound,you will not be dissapointed
|
| |
04-04-2005, 2:42 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 241
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0 | TV Headache
There will doubtless be a range of HD ready TVs to choose from by this time next year but very little content to watch on it. Even if you're comfortable with paying a hefty subscription to receive the hi-def feeds I'd still go for CRT because it offers the best picture quality 100% of the time now, and probably even 95% of the time in the future. Even HD-compatible LCDs and plasmas look relatively bad on normal SD broadcast material.
I'd recommend the Sony but whatever you do, go have a look at the picture quality yourself because and set with picture enhancement technology can look unnatrual if you're used to unadulterated TV.
BTW, good thread name |
| |
04-04-2005, 3:30 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 45
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2 |
What do you mean by the picture enhancement, do you mean the sony doesnot have it, is it the pixel plus 2 thing on the panny and the cryistal clear thing on the toshiba?
So Far ........... Toshiba 1
Sony 1
Panny 0
Philips 0 |
| |
04-04-2005, 6:35 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | New Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0 |
I 've recently had the same problem regarding which Tv to buy. Your choice is very similar to the one I had also. I looked at comments on here about the models and in the end it does come down to personal opinion. Some people regard the Panasonic better that the Toshiba and the Phililps whilst others argue differently. In the end I decided to go for the Philips 9509 for £680 from Sound and Vision as the picture I saw looked fantastic.
I shall tell you more about the tv when it arrives on Friday.
Good luck
Gareth
|
| |
04-04-2005, 8:18 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 45
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2 |
cool, Will be interesting to see what you have to say about the pixel plus 2 tech.
so far...... toshiba 1
sony 1
philips 1
panny 0
Last edited by handers101; 05-04-2005 at 11:27 AM.
|
| |
04-04-2005, 10:33 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 241
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by handers101 What do you mean by the picture enhancement, do you mean the sony doesnot have it, is it the pixel plus 2 thing on the panny and the cryistal clear thing on the toshiba? | No, the Sony does have it (DRC-MF, they call it) but that wasn't my point. If you're used to a good basic picture then even simple 100Hz can seem strange because all the 'enhancement' systems that you've mentioned are changing the picture from what was originaly broadcast i.e. 625 lines at 50Hz. Most of them throw-up some kind of side effect (picture noise, motion blur etc.) which in some people's opinion make them almost unwatchable, despite the rave reviews they get elsewhere. Hence my advice to have a good look at the real items before you buy.
|
| |
05-04-2005, 11:45 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 45
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2 |
I see, i went to currys last night just to see what they had, thought i could see them all in the one place but they did not have a single model i was looking for, so going to try somewhere else tonight.
|
| |
05-04-2005, 11:52 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 45
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2 | Score After Seeing Other Similar Thread Posted Today
So Far....
panny 3
toshiba 2
sony 1
philips 1
seems like the panny is much liked for its DVD playback |
| |
05-04-2005, 3:21 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,163
Thanks: Gave 90, Got 80 |
... would someone be able to answer the following pls!
basically I was looking for a 32" CRT with Component input - reason for this is that my Pioneer DV-470 manual states that progsessive scan is only available from the component output... thing is i really liked the picture of the Philips 9503 PixelPlus2 & the dealer told me that even though the input will be via scart RGB (interlaced), it will be converted to progrsessive due to the pixel-plus processing!
TRUE ?
and if so - is this similar to the farrudia chips on DLP projectors?
|
| |
05-04-2005, 4:10 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | New Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0 |
With regards to going to Currys, Handers101, I did the same thing last week.
My local Currys still stock the Tosh for £799 but none of the rest. Comet used to do the Tosh for a hundred quid cheaper but now it's a discontinued line with them. If you want to look on the high street for a Philips, then Dixons stock them. I assume you are trying to see what they look like as the price in Dixons is sky high. £999 for the Philips but at least you can see it in action. Not sure where to find the Panasonic unless it's a decent tv store.
Gareth
|
| |
05-04-2005, 6:41 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 45
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2 |
hi, thanks for the advice, I went to comet today but they didn't have anything there. Think i'll try John Lewis next. Yeah all I want to do is see them - i won't be paying high street prices thats for sure!!
|
| |
05-04-2005, 7:23 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: a deep pit full of rattle snakes and a very old looking Indiana Jones, if someone could just pass me a branch or something......
Posts: 240
Thanks: Gave 14, Got 16 |
is that the 36" tosh your looking at or is that a typo?
cant vouch for the 32" but its big brother has won hands down against all other 36" sets i've seen...... trying to get JL to price match right now. They dont stock the 32" version BTW if thats what your after......
If your counting votes though, mine is for the Tosh.
...the 32 even has a smaller footprint than my current 28!
*crawls away*
__________________
......................
my tail is not a play-thing.
......................
|
| |
05-04-2005, 10:19 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 241
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0 |
I think this-time-last-year you could probably see them all under one roof but the major stores seem to have shoved all the CRTs into a corner and only giving floor space to the models that cost significantly less than LCD. It's a shame because it meens that all those of us who are looking for picture quality can't actually try it out!  (But then I guess they wouldn't sell so many flat TVs if customers could see that the CRT TV next to it had twice the picture quality at half the price...)
|
| |
06-04-2005, 2:05 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 45
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2 |
Yeah its the 36 i am looking at..... seems to be the best 36 around, only prob i see is weight, i got to get it up three flights of stairs, lol.... would be worth the stuggle i recon
|
| | | |