 | |
13-11-2008, 6:04 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 53
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 6 | HF100 vs HG20
Hi guys,
being a long advocate of HF100, i'm facing a dillema now since HG20 is gone down in price!
We have (cheapest top)
HF100 ($580)
HG20 ($640)
HF10 ($650)
HF100 has no internal flash, 17mbps rate
HG20 has a 60GB HDD and 24mbps rate
HF10 has 16GB internal flash, 17mbps rate
Optics are the same for all models, the nobrainer here seems the HG20 indeed, what experiences have you had with this camera until now?
Thanks for a quick reply, i need to decide by tonight! |
| |
13-11-2008, 8:59 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 339
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 14 | Re: HF100 vs HG20 Quote:
Originally Posted by zeroice Hi guys,
being a long advocate of HF100, i'm facing a dillema now since HG20 is gone down in price!
We have (cheapest top)
HF100 ($580)
HG20 ($640)
HF10 ($650)
HF100 has no internal flash, 17mbps rate
HG20 has a 60GB HDD and 24mbps rate
HF10 has 16GB internal flash, 17mbps rate
Optics are the same for all models, the nobrainer here seems the HG20 indeed, what experiences have you had with this camera until now?
Thanks for a quick reply, i need to decide by tonight!  | Thought this was a UK only site? lol no worries  , I wouldn't be able to advise you on the prices, but I'm going to get a HF100. It depends what you want really. I personally think flash memory is the way forward now.
Also HDD break at high altitude (3000m+) so I don't want to risk that if I travel with it.
|
| |
13-11-2008, 9:12 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 53
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 6 | Re: HF100 vs HG20
hehe, i was going to get the HF100 myself, until i saw the prices last night. As far as HD problems go, you can always resort to SDHC...
basically for $60 more you have 60GB storage and 24mbps bitrates. damn i'm confused
i read lately that there are some editing issues with HDD cams, what's this all about?
the SDHC version does not have these issues or how come? Seems strange the storage media plays a role in editing the footage, since it's done after the transfer to PC anyway
edit: probably the advantage of 24 vs 17mbps is not what most people expect, but on the 60GB HDD you can stick ~ 7hrs of footage in 17mbps.
7 hrs are equivalent to ~ 4 16GB SD cards, atm more than $200 in total. From this point of view, having this storage for $60 more is definately a plus.
How about battery life? Should i expect lower life from a HDD cam than from Flash/SD based?
I'm all panic since there's someone coming over from the US next week and can bring over a cam... http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...VCHD_Hard.html
Last edited by zeroice; 13-11-2008 at 9:42 AM.
|
| |
13-11-2008, 9:54 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 339
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 14 | Re: HF100 vs HG20 Quote:
Originally Posted by zeroice hehe, i was going to get the HF100 myself, until i saw the prices last night. As far as HD problems go, you can always resort to SDHC...
basically for $60 more you have 60GB storage and 24mbps bitrates. damn i'm confused
i read lately that there are some editing issues with HDD cams, what's this all about?
the SDHC version does not have these issues or how come? Seems strange the storage media plays a role in editing the footage, since it's done after the transfer to PC anyway
edit: probably the advantage of 24 vs 17mbps is not what most people expect, but on the 60GB HDD you can stick ~ 7hrs of footage in 17mbps.
7 hrs are equivalent to ~ 4 16GB SD cards, atm more than $200 in total. From this point of view, having this storage for $60 more is definately a plus.
How about battery life? Should i expect lower life from a HDD cam than from Flash/SD based?
I'm all panic since there's someone coming over from the US next week and can bring over a cam... Canon | VIXIA HG20 AVCHD Hard Disk Drive Camcorder | 3085B001 | Just from physics I would expect you to have less battery life with a HDD cam over a SD cam, however it also depends upon which battery is supplied and the energy efficiency of the camera itself.
I understand your predicament, if space is an issue go for the HG20, I just like being able to remove and store my memory safely after I have recorded onto it. If I was just using my camcorder for home use I would go with the HG20, but as I am using flash memory I will remove it each time so that I can make sure that I never lose my videos when I travel |
| |
15-11-2008, 7:44 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 53
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 6 | Re: HF100 vs HG20
yay, couldn't handle it anymore and got the HG20 
will post infos about it in the HG20/21 thread if anyone is interested.
|
| |
15-11-2008, 8:55 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Hillingdon /Hayes, Middx
Posts: 14,229
Thanks: Gave 425, Got 2,078 | Re: HF100 vs HG20 Quote:
Originally Posted by zeroice yay, couldn't handle it anymore and got the HG20 
will post infos about it in the HG20/21 thread if anyone is interested. | Pls do
I trialled the HG10 and thoroughly enjoyed it but Canon have launched 4-5 new models since than including the HG20
__________________ S3Stuff
Opinions expressed by myself are not necessarily those of AV Forums..or even mine! |
| |
16-11-2008, 8:58 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 53
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 6 | Re: HF100 vs HG20
senu, just noticed there's no HG20/21 thread...at least in the camcorder section. I'll open one when i get myself together to write a small review |
| |
19-11-2008, 2:28 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Rochester, Kent
Posts: 847
Thanks: Gave 62, Got 114 | Re: HF100 vs HG20 Quote:
Originally Posted by zeroice senu, just noticed there's no HG20/21 thread...at least in the camcorder section. I'll open one when i get myself together to write a small review  | Unless you count this one that is: Canon announce HG20 and HG21  
__________________
I would put a sig here, but I can't be bothered...
|
| | | |