 |
|
|
14-05-2008, 12:12 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Prominent Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Worcester
Posts: 3,395
Thanks: Gave 13, Got 24
|
Is HDV getting less popular?
I am thinking of getting an HDV camera next year, seems to be the best choice for what I want.
There sems to be very few models available, are they being phased out or something?
__________________
Martin - Sony KDL46W4500, STRDB930, SLHF950 SuperBeta, Pioneer 575, Castle Pembroke, Keep, & Clydes, Pace Twin PVR, BTVision. Sony TRV33 video camera. PS3
|
|
|
14-05-2008, 12:23 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
New Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 12
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
|
Re: Is HDV getting less popular?
I have read some where that they are slowly being phased out.
|
|
|
14-05-2008, 12:45 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Ex Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 4,674
Thanks: Gave 104, Got 242
|
Re: Is HDV getting less popular?
At the consumer end of the market they are being replaced by DVD (for the Plug 'n' Play (and curse when it goes wrong) type.
HDD is popular but IMHO will be phased out in favour of solid state memory stick/SDHC card cams ever more rapidly as the cost of solid sate media drops.
|
|
|
14-05-2008, 1:02 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 6,512
Thanks: Gave 90, Got 749
|
Re: Is HDV getting less popular?
It is clear that there is more focus on, and more choice with AVCHD models over HDV, and I'd expect that to continue.
Though there never have been many "pure consumer" HDV models. Since Sony had the HC1, and Canon the HV10, each of Sony and Canon have had 1 or 2 models. That's still the case. Panasonic never did HDV; JVC did but only for prosumer models.
Sony and Canon continue to have a number of prosumer/pro HDV models as well; e.g. Sony FX1, FX7.
So, rather than HDV being phased out, it's more like HD is taking off; and AVCHD is the format taking off with it (for consumers). HDV continues more or less as it is, though we may see it dropped sometime in the future (for consumer models at least; for prosumer models I think it will last longer).
__________________
Mark
|
|
|
14-05-2008, 2:40 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Prominent Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Worcester
Posts: 3,395
Thanks: Gave 13, Got 24
|
Re: Is HDV getting less popular?
Well hopefully some of these better sensors will appear on them by next year.
I like tapes as they are cheap portable and easy to archive.
Just where do you store all of your AVCHD footage?
__________________
Martin - Sony KDL46W4500, STRDB930, SLHF950 SuperBeta, Pioneer 575, Castle Pembroke, Keep, & Clydes, Pace Twin PVR, BTVision. Sony TRV33 video camera. PS3
|
|
|
14-05-2008, 3:03 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Ex Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 4,674
Thanks: Gave 104, Got 242
|
Re: Is HDV getting less popular?
On several HDDs.
|
|
|
15-05-2008, 8:10 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,647
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 109
|
Re: Is HDV getting less popular?
the sony hc-7 and canon hv30 are the only hdv cams now the fx-7 has gone and the fx1 although there are a few around they are not being made.
non tape i wont bother to count.
|
|
|
15-05-2008, 8:21 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 6,512
Thanks: Gave 90, Got 749
|
Re: Is HDV getting less popular?
There is the HC9; though that replaces the HC7, so the point that there aren't many models is still true.
__________________
Mark
|
|
|
15-05-2008, 8:29 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,647
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 109
|
Re: Is HDV getting less popular?
Quote:
Originally Posted by redsox_mark
There is the HC9; though that replaces the HC7, so the point that there aren't many models is still true.
|
yes the hc9 is what i meant sony have gone up through the numbers its hard to keep up.
|
|
|
15-05-2008, 6:26 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hillingdon /Hayes, Middx
Posts: 14,229
Thanks: Gave 425, Got 2,078
|
Re: Is HDV getting less popular?
In fairness to the AVCHD models, currently achievable video quality is rather very good ,stellar even.
There is a fundamental problem with all Hi def recording at consumer level which is the handling of motion by intra frame video formats.. HD (Pro) is better than HDV and HDV better than AVCHD ( for motion handling) but the gap is closing.
However, the Pro Semi Pro HDV models are close enough to HD to enable it to be usable for Pro projects.
I get the impression that because of its consumer roots, there has been no move to more AVCHD to get accepted by the Serious enthusiast or Semi Pro aspirants , even though they would happy to use a tapeless medium provided the quality does not suffer. It isn't the medium it is the implementation and output
Tape HDV models will be around ... and maybe eventually disappear but I would still get one for projects which may end up beyond friends and family
For very good domestic/ Type use, the latest AVCHD camcorders will not fail to impress..
It is in trying to promote them that tape is being removed from the spotlight despite no real technological inferiority
Reinforcing a perception that tape is old aged " non digital" technology, pseudo horror stories of difficulty in download to PC, non linear access have been cleverly used by marketing to make tape seem less desirable..It will go, eventually but not for lack of capability
__________________
S3Stuff
Opinions expressed by myself are not necessarily those of AV Forums..or even mine!
Last edited by senu; 15-05-2008 at 8:29 PM.
|
|
|
15-05-2008, 8:25 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 6,512
Thanks: Gave 90, Got 749
|
Re: Is HDV getting less popular?
There are pro formats which use solid state media, but they are pricy; e.g the Sony EX3
http://www.creativevideo.co.uk/publi...r=sony_pmw-ex3
__________________
Mark
|
|
|
15-05-2008, 8:30 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hillingdon /Hayes, Middx
Posts: 14,229
Thanks: Gave 425, Got 2,078
|
Re: Is HDV getting less popular?
...But they dont record consumer AVCHD ( as currently implemented)
or HDV..
__________________
S3Stuff
Opinions expressed by myself are not necessarily those of AV Forums..or even mine!
|
|
|
15-05-2008, 8:35 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 6,512
Thanks: Gave 90, Got 749
|
Re: Is HDV getting less popular?
The EX3 gives a choice of a 35Mb/s High Quality mode or a 25Mb/s, HDV 1080i compatible mode. But no AVCHD, correct.
__________________
Mark
|
|
|
15-05-2008, 8:48 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hillingdon /Hayes, Middx
Posts: 14,229
Thanks: Gave 425, Got 2,078
|
Re: Is HDV getting less popular?
Thanks
..that however seems to reinforce the fact that well implemented HDV is nearer the HD quality the Pros like and can end up in Sky HD programs!
and
JVCs HD7 (HDV on HDD) was a missed opportunity
Watching HDV and AVCHD material off a PS3 HDD of identical scenes, I acknowledge that the mpeg2 files are bigger ( and less efficient for the likes of Bluray) but they are by no means poorer on video quality as some reviews would now have us believe..
Im a little confused when in reviews of the newer AVCHD models, HDV starts getting a slating.
It seems that AVCHD cannot be praised in reviews without HDV getting a knocking..
In the end regardless of format used to record, those who need discerning quality will chose whichever meets their need
In one of the reviews Chrishull had linked to in an earlier thread, A Pro using Sonys Z1 liked the SR 12 but wouldn't reach for it ( instead of his Z1) for any serious work expect as a B roll for short cutaways , or for family video snapshots
__________________
S3Stuff
Opinions expressed by myself are not necessarily those of AV Forums..or even mine!
Last edited by senu; 15-05-2008 at 10:26 PM.
|
|
|
16-05-2008, 8:58 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,647
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 109
|
Re: Is HDV getting less popular?
Quote:
Originally Posted by senu
Thanks
..that however seems to reinforce the fact that well implemented HDV is nearer the HD quality the Pros like and can end up in Sky HD programs!
and
JVCs HD7 (HDV on HDD) was a missed opportunity
Watching HDV and AVCHD material off a PS3 HDD of identical scenes, I acknowledge that the mpeg2 files are bigger ( and less efficient for the likes of Bluray) but they are by no means poorer on video quality as some reviews would now have us believe..
Im a little confused when in reviews of the newer AVCHD models, HDV starts getting a slating.
It seems that AVCHD cannot be praised in reviews without HDV getting a knocking..
In the end regardless of format used to record, those who need discerning quality will chose whichever meets their need
In one of the reviews Chrishull had linked to in an earlier thread, A Pro using Sonys Z1 liked the SR 12 but wouldn't reach for it ( instead of his Z1) for any serious work expect as a B roll for short cutaways , or for family video snapshots
|
if i had the money and was not going through one of my stages [when i lose interest a bit ie vhc period,svhc revived me for a while then tailed off until mini dv then that started going until hdv, now thats going]i would get a sony z7 and a sr12,the z7 is a great pro cam the sr12 takes video as good if not better than any consumer cam,the z7 is big too big for other than pro work nice to own one though.
Last edited by chrishull3; 16-05-2008 at 9:04 AM.
|
|
|
| |