| Re: Video 8 encoding and editing Having transferred the analogue footage to DVD, I am then hoping to be able to use the DVD's as the source for editing on my PC in which case it will already be in digital VOB format. .
Not a problem By the way, does NLE refer to non linear editing? Yes ,insofar as the edit does not need to be done in the sequence with which the footage was shot. Any resulting chronology of the edited version would be due entirely to the Editors storytelling ability Your comment about PQ (picture quality?) taking a hit seems to indicate I should avoid encoding to DV, AVI or WMV until last, in other words do the editing first.
Not if you already have the video as VOB ( ie mpeg2)
If you captured to DV AVI from analogue, that would be best starting quality. It is desirable that editing be done as in this format and only for end stage use should any conversion happen but this isnt the case with you.
However in these days of HDD camcorders, DVD camcorders ( and in your case DVD from settop), you would be editing Mpeg
As such editing with mpeg as starting material ( VOB in your case) is rather more mainstream now
During editing, footage gets rendered, this rendering affects DV AVI very minimally.. mpeg a bit more so.
There are dedicated mpeg editors and "Normal" editors" which are better at mpeg editing due to have "smart rendering" abilities
However recent mainstream Software is getting cleverer at editing mpeg to minimise this PQ deterioration
Of the Video formats, DV AVI is the least compressed.( and suffers the least "generational" loss from re ecoding) Analogy: the dubbed recording of a cassette tape which was itself recorded from a CD will be much worse than the CD Audio quality
Editing and then re-encoding compressed video will result in the end product being worse than starting material
Last edited by senu; 30-04-2007 at 12:04 AM.
|