Español Français Deutsch Italiano Nederlands Svenska Dansk Japanese Chinese (Simplified) Russian
 
AVForums.com twitter AVForums is a member of CEDIA. THX certified reviewer.  Click for more information. AVForums reviewers are ISF Certified.  Click for more information.
 
The UK's biggest and best home entertainment electronics forums  
4 million visitors each month


Forums Register Blogs Information Social Groups Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   AVForums.com > Home Electronics > Camcorders and Video Editing

Today's price checkPowered by
Panasonic SDR-S26
Sony HDR-XR520VE 240GB
Canon Legria FS200
Panasonic HDC-SD10
Panasonic SDR-S26 
Sony HDR-XR520VE 240GB 
Canon Legria FS200 
Panasonic HDC-SD10 
Sony DCR-SR37E 60GB 
JVC GZ-MG630 60GB 
Sanyo Xacti VPC-CG10 
JVC GZ-MS120 
Panasonic HDC-SD200 
Samsung SMX-C10 
 More...Prices updated November 23rd at 1:30pm and include delivery.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-04-2007, 9:15 PM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 52
Thanks: Gave 13, Got 1
what is the best format for picture quality?

need a camcorder, got £500, just want best picture quality and prefer widescreen to play back through my 42" plasma, thought maybee get one that rec direct to dvd or hdd, but gadget show tested 3 hdd camcorders and thought picture quality not as good as mini dv, so now i am a bit confused because i would of thought hdd should give best picture quality.
puppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2007, 10:08 PM   #2 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
redsox_mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 6,512
Thanks: Gave 90, Got 749
Re: what is the best format for picture quality?

DV still gives you best quality for the money. A big part of this is the format itself, it is a less compressed format than the MPEG2 used on HDD cams. And that HDD cams are more expensive. A high end HDD cam will be better than an entry level DV cam, but in the same price range the DV cam will be better.

With £500 you can afford to go either way, as that will get you a decent quality HDD cam like the Sony SR190.... or you could get a DV cam like the Panasonic GS320 with 3 CCDs.

Or spend £600ish and get a High Def HDV model..
__________________
Mark
redsox_mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2007, 10:10 PM   #3 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hillingdon /Hayes, Middx
Posts: 14,230
Thanks: Gave 425, Got 2,078
Re: what is the best format for picture quality?

Quote:
Originally Posted by puppy View Post
need a camcorder, got £500, just want best picture quality and prefer widescreen to play back through my 42" plasma, thought maybee get one that rec direct to dvd or hdd, but gadget show tested 3 hdd camcorders and thought picture quality not as good as mini dv, so now i am a bit confused because i would of thought hdd should give best picture quality.
I wonder why you thought that. The MiniDV though tape uses a less compressed digital format ( DV AVI) than HDD

However Commercial DVDs use the mpeg2 format. This is the same format that HDD and DVD camcorders use
Indeed it is the Format that MiniDV footage (DV AVI) becomes when it ts footage becomes DVD
DV AVI is best starting quality but unless you want to play it form camccorder to Display :It will become an mpeg2
What makes a difference is the quality of the mpeg encoder
As such a Good HDD camcorder may be all you need but Footage recorded as DV AVI and then encoded to mpeg2 later may end up better quality that native HDD footage

Last edited by senu; 07-04-2007 at 10:20 PM.
senu is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2007, 8:57 AM   #4 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
redsox_mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 6,512
Thanks: Gave 90, Got 749
Re: what is the best format for picture quality?

This may not apply to "puppy", but my theory is part of the reason many people prefer HDD (and to some extent DVD) cams over DV tape is their experience moving from poor quality VHS tape to better quality DVD. So they associate tape with lesser quality. Of course we all know this is apples and oranges, digital tape is nothing like VHS, and is less compressed than MPEG2 etc..... But still I believe this is part of the reason for the demand for non-tape based camcorders.
__________________
Mark
redsox_mark is offline   Reply With Quote



Bookmarks

Tags
format, picture, quality
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:48 PM.

AV Forums
Optimised for Firefox.
RSS Feed
AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited.
Copyright © 2000-2009 M2N E. & O. E.
Global Gold
Web Hosting