Español Français Deutsch Italiano Nederlands Svenska Dansk Japanese Chinese (Simplified) Russian
 
AVForums.com twitter AVForums is a member of CEDIA. THX certified reviewer.  Click for more information. AVForums reviewers are ISF Certified.  Click for more information.
 
The UK's biggest and best home entertainment electronics forums  
4 million visitors each month


Forums Register Blogs Information Social Groups Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   AVForums.com > Home Electronics > Camcorders and Video Editing

Today's price checkPowered by
Panasonic SDR-S26
Sony HDR-XR520VE 240GB
Canon Legria FS200
Panasonic HDC-SD10
Panasonic SDR-S26 
Sony HDR-XR520VE 240GB 
Canon Legria FS200 
Panasonic HDC-SD10 
Sony DCR-SR37E 60GB 
JVC GZ-MG630 60GB 
Sanyo Xacti VPC-CG10 
JVC GZ-MS120 
Panasonic HDC-SD200 
Samsung SMX-C10 
 More...Prices updated November 24th at 12:30pm and include delivery.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-04-2007, 7:46 AM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 48
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
what low cost vidcam has this spec?

Hello
What is the lowest cost vid-cam that has this spec:

1.[4mm focal length at wide angle (smaller is better)] - edited 7th april to read as the line below.

1.wide view equal or better than focal length of 3.6mm on a 1/4.7 chip
2.manual, optical zoom
3.av out
4.lanc socket

any format is fine

appreciate if anyone has a knowledge of low cost vid-cams that have this spec. thanks for thoughts/knowledge.

stephen

Last edited by inquisitive; 07-04-2007 at 4:52 PM.
inquisitive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2007, 10:05 AM   #2 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
redsox_mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 6,512
Thanks: Gave 90, Got 749
Re: what low cost vidcam has this spec?

4mm focal length at wide angle (smaller is better)

To me this is an odd request. I guess what you want is the performance to be as wide angle as possible? The reason this request is odd is that the effective wide angle is a function of the sensor size as well as the focal length. So a camcorder with focal length of 5mm and a 1/3" CCD will shoot a wider angle than one with a focal length of 3mm with a 1/6" CCD.

manual, optical zoom
av out


These are no problem, every camcorder has this.

lanc socket

This (combined with low cost) is a problem. Only Sony and Canon support the LANC protocol. And a LANC socket is generally reserved for high end models.

The only reasonably affordable model I know of with a LANC socket is Sony HC96 - which is discontinued, but can still be found. As it has a large 1/3" CCD the focal distance is 5.1mm, but this produces the same effective focal length as a lens with 2.55mm and a 1/6" CCD. Converted to 35mm equivelent the lens/sensor will perform like a 42.8mm lens. Prices and links here
http://www.pricerunner.co.uk/pl/8-54...Compare-Prices
__________________
Mark
redsox_mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2007, 4:45 PM   #3 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 48
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Re: what low cost vidcam has this spec?

Quote:
To me this is an odd request. I guess what you want is the performance to be as wide angle as possible? The reason this request is odd is that the effective wide angle is a function of the sensor size as well as the focal length. So a camcorder with focal length of 5mm and a 1/3" CCD will shoot a wider angle than one with a focal length of 3mm with a 1/6" CCD.
....... umm, good point, thanks....... yep, the performance to be as wide as posible is what the requirement is indeed for.


The requirement I am trying to equal (or even better) was first trialed on a sony PDX10... it had 3.6mm on a 1/4.7 ccd... then I attached a 0.7 wide angle clip-on lens to the 37mm diameter filter thread. This wide angle with the ability for a bit of optical zoom is important factor.

If I can edit the first thread, I will change this.
thanks again.

....... Is there a table, or a formula somwwhere where I could mix and match the FL withthe chip size to get a comparison?
inquisitive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2007, 5:21 PM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 48
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Re: what low cost vidcam has this spec?

Ive just done some rough comparitive maths based on your info in post of:
Quote:
......a large 1/3" CCD the focal distance is 5.1mm, but this produces the same effective focal length as a lens with 2.55mm and a 1/6" CCD
for a pdx10 with a 3.6mm on a 1/4.7 chip.....the equivalent on a 1/3 chip would be a 5.65mm (ish)

so if I am thinking this the correct way around, the sony HC96 with its 5.1mm on its 1/3 chip would indeed actually give a wider view than the pdx10 with its 3.6mm on its 1/4.7 chip.


stephen
inquisitive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2007, 9:57 PM   #5 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
redsox_mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 6,512
Thanks: Gave 90, Got 749
Re: what low cost vidcam has this spec?

Yes, that sounds right.

You can add a wide angle converter to the HC96 (30mm thread).
__________________
Mark
redsox_mark is offline   Reply With Quote



Bookmarks

Tags
cost, low, spec, vidcam
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:36 PM.

AV Forums
Optimised for Firefox.
RSS Feed
AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited.
Copyright © 2000-2009 M2N E. & O. E.
Global Gold
Web Hosting