Español Français Deutsch Italiano Nederlands Svenska Dansk Japanese Chinese (Simplified) Russian
 
AVForums.com twitter AVForums is a member of CEDIA. THX certified reviewer.  Click for more information. AVForums reviewers are ISF Certified.  Click for more information.
 
The UK's biggest and best home entertainment electronics forums  
4 million visitors each month


Forums Register Blogs Information Social Groups Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   AVForums.com > Home Electronics > Camcorders and Video Editing

Today's price checkPowered by
Panasonic SDR-S26
Sony HDR-XR520VE 240GB
Canon Legria FS200
Panasonic HDC-SD10
Panasonic SDR-S26 
Sony HDR-XR520VE 240GB 
Canon Legria FS200 
Panasonic HDC-SD10 
Sony DCR-SR37E 60GB 
JVC GZ-MG630 60GB 
Sanyo Xacti VPC-CG10 
JVC GZ-MS120 
Panasonic HDC-SD200 
Samsung SMX-C10 
 More...Prices updated November 23rd at 3:30pm and include delivery.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19-04-2006, 1:23 PM   #1 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 20
Thanks: Gave 1, Got 1
Any help appreciated!

Hi everyone, I'm currently looking into purchasing my first camcorder and am a bit gobsmacked by the huge variety there is available!

Now I like the idea of having a camera with built in HDD, I'm all for latest technology etc etc but i have a few concerns. One of the main reasons for getting the camera is I get married later in the year and it would be nice to have the camcorder for the day and then to take on the honeymoon. I'm a little worried that we'll get half way through the honeymoon and the HDD will be out of space and it will just be something else to carry on the journey home! With the MiniDV the tape gets full, you put a new one in. So long as I have enough tapes, no need to worry about running out of space.

I'm also concerned about the picture quality, I'm quite big on quality and so would want to be using it on highest quality settings at all times, so even less storage space on a camera with built in HDD.

I notice cameras like the JVC GZMG21EK have a CCD of 800,000pixels but MiniDV cameras like the Sony DCR HC44 are over 1 mega pixel. Is this difference in resolution likely to make a huge amount of difference?

The MiniDV seems to have several advantages, for example, the tape gets full, you put a new one in.

What I really want to be able to do is use the camcorder then simply plug it into my DVD recorder and either burn it to disk or onto the DVD recorders HDD. Can I do this with a miniDV camcorder? If you can is it as simple as plugging it in pressing play on the camera and record on the DVD recorder?

Sorry for all the questions, any help you can give me would be much appreciated.

Many Thanks

Oh and one last questions, what is the benefit of having a DV Input into the camera?
iball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-04-2006, 3:35 PM   #2 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
redsox_mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 6,512
Thanks: Gave 90, Got 749
Some answers:

1. The format of standard definition video is fixed (for PAL 720x576). An 800,000 pixel CCD is ample to cover this. More pixels doesn’t improve the picture for video – the extra pixels would only be useful for stills.
2. Yes, if you have a DVD recorder you can simply connect the camcorder to the DVD recorder and press play – better yet if your DVD recorder has DV-in.
3. DV input: The main benefit of this is if you edit on a PC; you can then output your edited movie in it’s original DV format back to tape.


Mark
redsox_mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-04-2006, 3:56 PM   #3 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 20
Thanks: Gave 1, Got 1
Thanks for that, so DV in isn't an essential as my computer won't really get used for editing, I don't have the patience for it, I just want to copy straight to a disc.

And just to clarify, things like the New Sony which will record onto a 8cm DVD with a 3.3mega pixel CCD won't improve picture quality for video, but will take still pictures of better quality? And presumably even with 3.3 CCD the quality will not be as good as a normal digi camera with a 6 megapixel resolution?

Thanks again, I really am struggling to decide!
iball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-04-2006, 4:14 PM   #4 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
redsox_mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 6,512
Thanks: Gave 90, Got 749
Correct – those extra pixels on the new Sony HDD camcorder are only useful for still photos. It can be useful to be able to take reasonably good stills with the camcorder (in cases where you want to shoot video and don’t want to carry a separate camera for stills), but you are right that these megapixel camcorders can’t compete with a good digital camera for stills.

What can make a difference to video quality is to have 3 separate CCDs (one for each colour). Also having physically larger CCDs can help with quality.. but more pixels, no help to video quality.

In general my opinion is that for standard definition, miniDV is the best quality format. Then there are HD formats like HDV…


Mark
redsox_mark is offline   Reply With Quote



Bookmarks

Tags
appreciated
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:53 PM.

AV Forums
Optimised for Firefox.
RSS Feed
AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited.
Copyright © 2000-2009 M2N E. & O. E.
Global Gold
Web Hosting