The most harmful monitor of these two.

az0000000 · 26-10-2005, 5:16 PM

Hello.
Could you tell me which monitor of these two harms my health the most?
Thank you.
Monitor 1

Monitor 2

neilneil · 26-10-2005, 11:08 PM

The one with the lowest refresh rate will likley harm your eyes the most.

AOC used to be a reasonable make. I had one for a good few years and it was fine.
I then switched to my current but old (6 years) iiyama which has been great but it's showing it's age now and I'll probably go flat LCD soon.

-Neil

az0000000 · 27-10-2005, 1:02 PM

Thanks.
Does it mean that AOC is better?

**senu** · 27-10-2005, 2:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by az0000000

Thanks.
Does it mean that AOC is better?

. AOC, iiyama, Samsung, Sony, Phillips, Take your pick: the actual CRT/ TFT's are only made by a handful of manufacturers for the rest of the world. Rebranding gets you more enhacements and in some cases ( gets more cash off you)
If say you like German cars you may be hard pressed to say which of the Mercs, BMW's ,VW or Audi is the better brand.
I think the point about TFTs is that . The picture quality has become very good compared to CRT and they are thinner, consume less power look prettier Have no flicker ( good for you eyes ,says my optometrist wife

.) and are actually now quite affordable, a 19" costing about £200. I think they are now the way foward for Computer monitors

az0000000 · 29-10-2005, 10:03 AM

Thanks.