Español Français Deutsch Italiano Nederlands Svenska Dansk Japanese Chinese (Simplified) Russian
 
AVForums.com twitter AVForums is a member of CEDIA. THX certified reviewer.  Click for more information. AVForums reviewers are ISF Certified.  Click for more information.
 
The UK's biggest and best home entertainment electronics forums  
4 million visitors each month


Forums Register Blogs Information Social Groups Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   AVForums.com > Home Electronics > Camcorders and Video Editing

Today's price checkPowered by
Panasonic SDR-S26
Sony HDR-XR520VE 240GB
Canon Legria FS200
Panasonic HDC-SD10
Panasonic SDR-S26 
Sony HDR-XR520VE 240GB 
Canon Legria FS200 
Panasonic HDC-SD10 
Sony DCR-SR37E 60GB 
JVC GZ-MG630 60GB 
Sanyo Xacti VPC-CG10 
JVC GZ-MS120 
Samsung SMX-C10 
Panasonic HDC-SD200 
 More...Prices updated November 25th at 4:30am and include delivery.

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Camcorders and Customs ..xrays harmful to equipment? richx_uk Camcorders and Video Editing 5 05-07-2005 4:20 PM
Harmful to DVD's? MJeeves Movies and The Cinema 1 05-09-2001 4:44 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26-10-2005, 5:16 PM   #1 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 16
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
The most harmful monitor of these two.

Hello.
Could you tell me which monitor of these two harms my health the most?
Thank you.
Monitor 1

Monitor 2
Attached Thumbnails
The most harmful monitor of these two.-monitor_1.jpg   The most harmful monitor of these two.-monitor_2.jpg  
az0000000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2005, 11:08 PM   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 444
Thanks: Gave 33, Got 36
The one with the lowest refresh rate will likley harm your eyes the most.

AOC used to be a reasonable make. I had one for a good few years and it was fine.
I then switched to my current but old (6 years) iiyama which has been great but it's showing it's age now and I'll probably go flat LCD soon.


-Neil
neilneil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2005, 1:02 PM   #3 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 16
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Thanks.
Does it mean that AOC is better?
az0000000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2005, 2:01 PM   #4 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hillingdon /Hayes, Middx
Posts: 14,243
Thanks: Gave 425, Got 2,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by az0000000
Thanks.
Does it mean that AOC is better?
. AOC, iiyama, Samsung, Sony, Phillips, Take your pick: the actual CRT/ TFT's are only made by a handful of manufacturers for the rest of the world. Rebranding gets you more enhacements and in some cases ( gets more cash off you)
If say you like German cars you may be hard pressed to say which of the Mercs, BMW's ,VW or Audi is the better brand.
I think the point about TFTs is that . The picture quality has become very good compared to CRT and they are thinner, consume less power look prettier Have no flicker ( good for you eyes ,says my optometrist wife .) and are actually now quite affordable, a 19" costing about £200. I think they are now the way foward for Computer monitors

Last edited by senu; 27-10-2005 at 8:34 PM.
senu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2005, 10:03 AM   #5 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 16
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Thanks.
az0000000 is offline   Reply With Quote



Bookmarks

Tags
harmful, monitor
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:04 AM.

AV Forums
Optimised for Firefox.
RSS Feed
AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited.
Copyright © 2000-2009 M2N E. & O. E.
Global Gold
Web Hosting