AVForums

Our philosophy in our forums, reviews, podcasts and feature videos is to promote audio and visual excellence by gathering and sharing the best information and resources available.

Help

To begin please visit our help section »

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

Member Log in

2005 - the year of widescreen camcorders?

Post Reply
Old 14-03-2005, 6:57 PM   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Leicester
Experience Points:
7,811, Level: 21
Points: 7,811, Level: 21 Points: 7,811, Level: 21 Points: 7,811, Level: 21
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 2, Got 12
Posts: 1,184
2005 - the year of widescreen camcorders?

Just been looking at Canon's camcorder section of their website and I see that the new low-end 800 series all feature a widescreen mode as standard. Considering that these can be had for about £300 these sound good for those of us who want widescreen but aren't into camcording enough to buy a higher end model. I'd assume other manufacturers will also be bringing widescreen down their ranges.

Having said that, I'm not quite sure how the widescreen mode works, whether it's cropping a 4:3 image or a true 16:9 capture that gets squashed down when recorded.

The reason for this confusion is that the description for the MV830i says
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canon Website
Wide Screen
The MV830i's high-resolution 16:9 mode is great for shooting cinemascope video and for playing back on widescreen monitors. At the push of a button, the camcorder automatically switches the LCD to Letterbox and uses the full width of the CCD sensor to capture true widescreen footage
which makes it sound like it's cropping a 4:3 whereas in the MV800 series overview it says:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canon Website
High resolution 16:9 mode
As well as the standard 4:3 aspect ratio, the MV800 series supports high resolution 16:9; similar to the ratio used for wide screen film-based movies. (An image’s aspect ratio is the ratio of an image’s width to its height.) When shooting in 16:9 mode with EIS off, the MV800 series camcorders utilise a full 540K pixels. This not only gives a higher resolution than previous models, it results in a wider angle of view which allows you to get more into each shot.
This would seem to suggest a 16:9 capture from the chip given that it's supposed to use 540k pixels in 16:9 mode.

Anyone got any ideas on which it actually is?
  Quote
Old 17-03-2005, 11:03 AM   #2
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Middlesbrough
Experience Points:
6,073, Level: 18
Points: 6,073, Level: 18 Points: 6,073, Level: 18 Points: 6,073, Level: 18
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 7, Got 11
Posts: 493
According to the Sony site more lines are added in the recording stage to give true widescreen recording. I have a Sony DCR-HC18E, it does the widescreen recording. The picture on the view finder goes to a widescreen picture with black bars top and bottom and the lens is supposed to go wider. The Sony website had a good description of it.
  Quote
Old 17-03-2005, 8:52 PM   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Leicester
Experience Points:
7,811, Level: 21
Points: 7,811, Level: 21 Points: 7,811, Level: 21 Points: 7,811, Level: 21
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 2, Got 12
Posts: 1,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by wicket
According to the Sony site more lines are added in the recording stage to give true widescreen recording. I have a Sony DCR-HC18E, it does the widescreen recording. The picture on the view finder goes to a widescreen picture with black bars top and bottom and the lens is supposed to go wider. The Sony website had a good description of it.
That's OK for Sony's models, but I was wondering what Canon's do, as in the past other manufacturers have simply cropped a 4:3 image, from what I understand.
  Quote
Old 17-03-2005, 11:09 PM   #4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Experience Points:
7,962, Level: 21
Points: 7,962, Level: 21 Points: 7,962, Level: 21 Points: 7,962, Level: 21
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 11, Got 14
Posts: 1,256
cerebros

Have seen these?
  Quote
Old 18-03-2005, 4:43 PM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Leicester
Experience Points:
7,811, Level: 21
Points: 7,811, Level: 21 Points: 7,811, Level: 21 Points: 7,811, Level: 21
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 2, Got 12
Posts: 1,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayne Moule
cerebros

Have seen these?

Yeah, saw them the next day after the original post, plus the HC39E & HC42E on one of the linking pages, although I think Sony were already well served for 16:9 capable cameras in the mid-range and up anyway, unlike Canon.

I'd be interested if anyone can make an informed opinion on whether the move to CMOS technology in the Sony DCR-PC1000E is going to make as big a difference to picture quality as claimed.
  Quote
Post Reply

Powered by  
 Latest popular product prices
Kodak PlaySport Zx5 
7 prices from
 £79.99 Click to show/hide the offers

Sony DCR-SX45E 
4 prices from
 £189.99 Click to show/hide the offers

Samsung SMX-F50BN 
4 prices from
 £119.99 Click to show/hide the offers

Toshiba Camileo H30 
1 price
 £107.00 Click to show/hide the offers

Panasonic SDR-S70 
7 prices from
 £116.00 Click to show/hide the offers

Panasonic HX-DC1 
7 prices from
 £123.95 Click to show/hide the offers

JVC GZ-HM30 
7 prices from
 £144.99 Click to show/hide the offers

Sony DCR-SX21E 
2 prices from
 £149.99 Click to show/hide the offers

 Updated February 13th at 1:30pm. Prices include delivery.


Thread information and display options
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off