Español Français Deutsch Italiano Nederlands Svenska Dansk Japanese Chinese (Simplified) Russian
 
AVForums.com twitter AVForums is a member of CEDIA. THX certified reviewer.  Click for more information. AVForums reviewers are ISF Certified.  Click for more information.
 
The UK's biggest and best home entertainment electronics forums  
4 million visitors each month


Forums Register Blogs Information Social Groups Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   AVForums.com > Home Electronics > Camcorders and Video Editing

Today's price checkPowered by
Panasonic SDR-S26
Sony HDR-XR520VE 240GB
Canon Legria FS200
Panasonic HDC-SD10
Panasonic SDR-S26 
Sony HDR-XR520VE 240GB 
Canon Legria FS200 
Panasonic HDC-SD10 
Sony DCR-SR37E 60GB 
JVC GZ-MG630 60GB 
Sanyo Xacti VPC-CG10 
JVC GZ-MS120 
Panasonic HDC-SD200 
Samsung SMX-C10 
 More...Prices updated November 24th at 5:30am and include delivery.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30-12-2004, 4:46 PM   #1 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 20
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Is digital really worth it?

I'm just about to buy a new camcorder and want to know views on whether I should save myself money by buying a Hi-8 camcorder such as the Sony TRV 228e, instead of something like the Sony HC14. I intend to use it for regular family events, and I need something that is easy to use, and that I can transfer movies to DVD via my PC.

What benefit is there in buying a digital model?
Hiddenmission is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-12-2004, 5:20 PM   #2 (permalink)
Conspicuous Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Rainham Essex
Posts: 7,625
Thanks: Gave 15, Got 465
Well a Hi8 camcorder will be far better in low light areas ie indoors under electric lighting.

other than the above I would recommend a digital camcorder over an old analogue cam because:

Getting the video onto a PC is far easier (and cheaper) with digital. A good quality analogue capture card/device will cost somewhere around £200 (you can get cheaper, but the quality of most of these will be fairly low) but a firewire card (if not already on the PC) will cost about £10.
DV camcorders are smaller and lighter than the old analogue cams, therefore you are more likely to carry it around with you.
In better lighting than stated above the PQ should be noticeably better with DV.

and I'm sure given time I could think of many more reasons to go digital. I'm sure others will come up with a few.

Mark.
__________________
Lexicon MC-8B. L/C/R: Blue Sky 6.5's, SL/SR/SBL/SBR: Blue Sky 5's, Sub: Velodyne DD-15
Panasonic NV-HS830, VTX-D800U via TiVo, Arcam DV29 & Sony BDP-S500 > Lumagen VisionHDP > Panasonic TH-46PZ85B. Marantz RC9200
MarkE19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-12-2004, 6:54 PM   #3 (permalink)
Prominent Member
 
MartinImber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Worcester
Posts: 3,395
Thanks: Gave 13, Got 24
DEFINATELY get a DV Camera - the end result is better about 25% higher resolution
__________________
Martin - Sony KDL46W4500, STRDB930, SLHF950 SuperBeta, Pioneer 575, Castle Pembroke, Keep, & Clydes, Pace Twin PVR, BTVision. Sony TRV33 video camera. PS3
MartinImber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-12-2004, 10:21 PM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
ibrox50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: glasgow
Posts: 79
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 1
recommend sony hc18e its an absolute peach
ibrox50 is offline   Reply With Quote



Bookmarks

Tags
digital, worth
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:02 AM.

AV Forums
Optimised for Firefox.
RSS Feed
AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited.
Copyright © 2000-2009 M2N E. & O. E.
Global Gold
Web Hosting