Español Français Deutsch Italiano Nederlands Svenska Dansk Japanese Chinese (Simplified) Russian
 
AVForums.com twitter AVForums is a member of CEDIA. THX certified reviewer.  Click for more information. AVForums reviewers are ISF Certified.  Click for more information.
 
The UK's biggest and best home entertainment electronics forums  
4 million visitors each month


Forums Register Blogs Information Social Groups Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   AVForums.com > Home Electronics > Camcorders and Video Editing

Today's price checkPowered by
Panasonic SDR-S26
Sony HDR-XR520VE 240GB
Canon Legria FS200
Panasonic HDC-SD10
Panasonic SDR-S26 
Sony HDR-XR520VE 240GB 
Canon Legria FS200 
Panasonic HDC-SD10 
Sony DCR-SR37E 60GB 
JVC GZ-MG630 60GB 
Sanyo Xacti VPC-CG10 
JVC GZ-MS120 
Panasonic HDC-SD200 
Samsung SMX-C10 
 More...Prices updated November 22nd at 6:30pm and include delivery.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-05-2004, 5:48 AM   #1 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Sony DCR-PC105 or 109???

I have decided to buy a miniDV cam and narrowed it down to Sony, but was confused between DCR PC 105 and 109. 109 although newer than 105 has been downgraded, or so it appears from the research that I have done on it.

The docking station is "the highlight" for 109. The downgrading of CCD and pixel count and the LCD screen resolution being halved (109 has half that of 105) to get a docking station accomodated for the same price almost. Is it worth it????? Also there is no built in flash in 109. From what I read from various sources (and there are not many comparing these two models), the opinion is divided about these two cams. Some go in for 109 just because that is newer technology while others say 105 is better. So am confused in 2004. Please help and enlighten me!!

Also, I noticed that Sony is coming out with newer models that are although smaller in size but the specs are lower than the previous generation ones. Talk about evolution!!!!!!!
confused2004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2004, 4:51 PM   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 51
Thanks: Gave 4, Got 2
I've mulled over this too, and have decided to get the 105. It seems that Sony have reduced the quality of the new models. Plus their claims of 'true' widescreen aren't quite accurate. From what i've read about the HC 40 it seems that its not anamorphic widescreen, just letterbox widescreen.
Prav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2004, 5:49 PM   #3 (permalink)
Prominent Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: manchester
Posts: 3,059
Thanks: Gave 185, Got 136
Hi guys I actually own a pc105 and as a dv cam it is pretty damn good but has the usual not to good in lowlight. I wouldnt rate the still photo taking as much to rave about either, without the flash indoors i would say pictures are quit iffy so the 109 must take iffy stills as well (indoors) if it has no flash built in. i use a sony dsc-w1 for still shots. Camcorders i think are really for movies not stills. hope this helps
mickey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2004, 8:57 AM   #4 (permalink)
Conspicuous Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Rainham Essex
Posts: 7,621
Thanks: Gave 15, Got 463
From what I can see of the new Sony camcorders they do tend to be a bit smaller with a fair bit lower quality.
The new(ish) updated model of my camcorder has the new features such as bluetooth & USB streaming which are of zero interest to me as all I am after is the best possible picture & sound quality for my money. I also think that a docking station is really just a gimick and certainly not worth paying more money for or loosing PQ. After all the only connection to a PC that I see you needing is firewire to transfer the video. So its just the 1 data and 1 power connection that you need to make, hardly a major hassle compared to sitting the cam on a cradle is it!!!

I'm not currently looking for a new cam, but if I were I would be looking for a better deal on an old model rather than pay more for a new model with all the whistles and bells but lower quality.

Mark.
__________________
Lexicon MC-8B. L/C/R: Blue Sky 6.5's, SL/SR/SBL/SBR: Blue Sky 5's, Sub: Velodyne DD-15
Panasonic NV-HS830, VTX-D800U via TiVo, Arcam DV29 & Sony BDP-S500 > Lumagen VisionHDP > Panasonic TH-46PZ85B. Marantz RC9200
MarkE19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2004, 10:04 PM   #5 (permalink)
Prominent Member
 
MartinImber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Worcester
Posts: 3,395
Thanks: Gave 13, Got 24
Hmmm seems TRV33 and PC105 were the high points then!
__________________
Martin - Sony KDL46W4500, STRDB930, SLHF950 SuperBeta, Pioneer 575, Castle Pembroke, Keep, & Clydes, Pace Twin PVR, BTVision. Sony TRV33 video camera. PS3
MartinImber is offline   Reply With Quote



Bookmarks

Tags
109, dcrpc105, sony
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:22 PM.

AV Forums
Optimised for Firefox.
RSS Feed
AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited.
Copyright © 2000-2009 M2N E. & O. E.
Global Gold
Web Hosting