AVForums

Our philosophy in our forums, reviews, podcasts and feature videos is to promote audio and visual excellence by gathering and sharing the best information and resources available.

Help

To begin please visit our help section »

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

Member Log in

Someone stop me buying a Sony PC105E/PC120E

Post Reply
Old 20-02-2004, 9:59 PM   #1
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cardiff
Experience Points:
3,262, Level: 13
Points: 3,262, Level: 13 Points: 3,262, Level: 13 Points: 3,262, Level: 13
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Posts: 12
Someone stop me buying a Sony PC105E/PC120E

Hi All,

For some bizarre reason I have settled on a Sony PC-105E/120E

Am not sure but I think the main reason is for the Sony Brand

I like the size of these cameras and I want DV In/Out as I intend to do Video Editing on my PC.

Optical and Digital Zooms are not the greatest either....

I am considering the PC120E as I can get one for around 720ish Pounds and it has a greater MegaPixel rating than the 105E

Can anyone recommend a better CamCorder in the 750pounds price bracket?

I cannot justify the jump of over 250pounds for the Sony PC-330 (Or whatever it is called)

Anyone know when the PC105/PC120 CamCorders came out?

Sorry for the questions, but this is my first foray into the Digital CamCorders, I am more at home with my Digital Camera's

--Roger
  Quote
Old 21-02-2004, 8:01 AM   #2
Conspicuous Member
 
witters's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Yorkshire
Experience Points:
20,307, Level: 34
Points: 20,307, Level: 34 Points: 20,307, Level: 34 Points: 20,307, Level: 34
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 383, Got 139
Posts: 8,728
If I were you I'd look at the Sony TRV33E which can be had for around £470 as it's being replaced. What features do your other choices have that you can't realistically do without? the 33 is a decent size as well. The 105 is really fiddly to operate, especially the zoom lever, which is too small.
  Quote
Old 21-02-2004, 8:44 PM   #3
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: northwest
Experience Points:
5,609, Level: 17
Points: 5,609, Level: 17 Points: 5,609, Level: 17 Points: 5,609, Level: 17
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 1
Posts: 14
I vouch for DCR PC120E which gives excellent pictures even at very low light.£750 is just about right at the moment.In my view it is far far better than its replacement DCR PC330 which sells for more than 1000 pounds.
  Quote
Old 23-02-2004, 11:19 AM   #4
Frenchie
Guest
Posts: n/a
I bought the DCRPC105E before Christmas for £620 at AJ Electronics, in their store.

Build quality is superb, size was key factor for me.

Zoom command is NOT fiddly, it's just different to the standard one used by BIGGER camcorders.

DCRPC105E is a compact camcorder. TRV33 is NOT a compact camcorder.
  Quote
Old 23-02-2004, 11:21 AM   #5
Frenchie
Guest
Posts: n/a
It has 'megapixel CCD' capability which means it can take shots of 1 megapixel.
PC-330 can take pictures of 3 megapixel.
At this time, PC-330 was too expensive for me and I already have a Canon S30 3.2 megapixel camera.

I think that VIDEO will be the same on PC-105 and PC-330
  Quote
Old 23-02-2004, 11:25 AM   #6
Conspicuous Member
 
witters's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Yorkshire
Experience Points:
20,307, Level: 34
Points: 20,307, Level: 34 Points: 20,307, Level: 34 Points: 20,307, Level: 34
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 383, Got 139
Posts: 8,728
Wether you consider the zoom on the 105 fiddly or not and the size of that compared and the 33 too small depends on the size of your hands. I tried the 105 and found it too small and too fiddly.

Each to his own - only way to tell is by trying them.
  Quote
Old 23-02-2004, 8:30 PM   #7
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cardiff
Experience Points:
3,262, Level: 13
Points: 3,262, Level: 13 Points: 3,262, Level: 13 Points: 3,262, Level: 13
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Posts: 12
Hi,

I took a look at the TRV33E and here's where I'm at with my requirements, I have a 3.2Megapix Camera so am not interested in taking pcitures per-se with this thing, just mainly Video.

I want something that is
- Small and compact so that it can be taken anywhere,
- DV-IN/Out for Video Editing on the PC.
- FireWire
- Analogue Video input
- the PC120 has a 1.5MegaPixel CCD (Which is good for Movies)
- Wind Noise Reduction on Mic
- FootPlate for attaching Mic/Light etc
- More than 1 CCD (Not possible on the range I am looking at)


- Can someone explain the Low-Lux?

-What is the difference between the 4.2-42mm of the PC120
in comparison to the 3.7 - 37 of the PC105? Is this the width
of the picture (ie distance from object to be in focus?)

- Also the Nightshot mode?

Thanks everyone for the comments so far, it looks like it's still the PC120 for me as it has everything I want.

--Roger (Who may order on Friday )
  Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 9:55 PM   #8
Member
 
owenw's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ireland
Experience Points:
3,987, Level: 14
Points: 3,987, Level: 14 Points: 3,987, Level: 14 Points: 3,987, Level: 14
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 1, Got 1
Posts: 265
I own an PC110 and while the miniDV image is excellent and it has pretty nifty features for a consumer camcorder. DV IN/OUT is essential IMO.

The biggest problem I found is that it is difficult to hold these small camcorders steady due to their size and lack of weight. Bigger cameras with a bit more weight lend themselves to a steadier shot. Steady-shot does help but it often makes the image grainy.

The other really annoying thing is that if you are using a tripod you have to keep taking the camcorder off the tripod to insert/eject tapes. Even if you use a quick release tripod attachment, it also has to be removed.

The buttons are small which some might find awkward and a lot of controls are lumped in to the menus instead of having individual buttons (the white balance control should *not* be in the menu IMO).

The nightshot uses infra-red (IR) to record and basically it's like looking through night vision goggles. I got bored with this gimmick pretty quick especially as people's eyes look scary!

Try and play with one if you can before parting with your hard-earned...

hth
  Quote
Old 10-03-2004, 9:39 PM   #9
matty2767
Guest
Posts: n/a
i would have to disagree with antibt. i had a pc120 and now a pc330 and the quality is much better on the newer model. and it records in widescreen.

and the video isnt the same on the pc105. as the 330 uses more pixels and has a bigger lens.
  Quote
Post Reply

Powered by  
 Latest popular product prices
Kodak PlaySport Zx5 
7 prices from
 £79.99 Click to show/hide the offers

Sony DCR-SX45E 
4 prices from
 £189.99 Click to show/hide the offers

Toshiba Camileo H30 
1 price
 £107.00 Click to show/hide the offers

Samsung SMX-F50BN 
4 prices from
 £119.99 Click to show/hide the offers

Panasonic SDR-S70 
7 prices from
 £116.00 Click to show/hide the offers

Panasonic HX-DC1 
7 prices from
 £123.95 Click to show/hide the offers

JVC GZ-HM30 
7 prices from
 £144.99 Click to show/hide the offers

Sony DCR-SX21E 
2 prices from
 £149.99 Click to show/hide the offers

 Updated February 11th at 3:30pm. Prices include delivery.


Thread information and display options
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off