| Re: Picture quality impressions on the following films ?
Picture quality opinions seem to differ VERY widely.
I thought the picture quality on "Flags of our Fathers" was stunning and stood out, but have to say that watching "Letters from Iwo Jima" I had to eject the disc a couple of times to make sure I was playing the HD-DVD side. Not that it was bad, just that it didn't stand out as being hi-def compared with the best standard DVDs. Maybe I just got blind-sided by the monochromatic de-saturated look of the whole film (I'm sick of this "gimmick". You shot the damned film in colour so show it us in colour. We don't see life through a monochramatic haze!)
I've just finished watching "Freedom Writers" and was disappointed with how soft the picture is, especially when compared with "The 40 Year-old virgin" which is almost 3D-like. "Freedom Writers" might just as well be a good quality standard DVD as far as this viewer's concerned. And yet the review over on AVPlay talks about there being "no sign of softness". What???!!!
The biggest disadvantage to "good" HD-DVD is the variation one finds. It often becomes too obvious that certain scenes were shot "soft" or had problems and they stick out like the proverbial sore thumb when everything around them is so good, where on poorer HD-DVDs or the standard DVD the transfer is such that all the scenes are soft and nothing stands out as being wrong.
The only problem I had with "The 40 Year-old virgin" was that the picture was so clear that you could see Steve Carell had rather thick TV make-up on in a couple of scenes, which took me "out" of the reality of the scene. On standard DVD I bet that wouldn't have happened.
Last edited by irascian; 20-05-2007 at 9:55 AM.
|