Quote:
Originally Posted by nwgarratt Because the film was filmed in 24 and 24 doesn't go into 50. It is adding 2 frames each second.
You should not get judder when outputting at the correct 1080p 24hz (or multiple off 48hz, 96hz etc) however, some panning get carried away and the frame rate cannot keep up.
There is judder with 576/50hz DVD's too. PAL's 4% SpeedUp |
That's assuming you're trying to make 24* (edited this cause I wrote 25!) go into 50, and it generally doesn't work like that. With PAL DVDs at 25fps, and presumably 1080i/50 BDs (which is just another way of saying 1080i/25fps), they simply take the 24fps progressive film material, split it into interlaced field pairs, and speed it up by 4%. There aren't many that repeat frames/fields, and if they do it's down to super-crap authoring.
With the vast majority of PAL DVDs, and I would guess 1080i/50 BDs, there are no additional frames, hence no additional judder. PAL DVDs do not judder more than film or NTSC. In fact, they judder less than NTSC. You
will get judder with 1080p/24 material because 24fps is a low framerate to begin with, but that judder is inherent to the source.
The only 1080i/50 BD that I have seen is The Promise, and that ran about 98 minutes, which corresponds to the 103 minute runtime of the US version when you take 4% PAL speed-up into account. The lack of additional judder and interlacing artefacts (both fields come from the same progressive frame) are the reason that many people preferred PAL DVDs, along with the superior resolution. Personally I hate PAL speed-up, so I usually went with NTSC if I had the option. Thankfully BD has largely eliminated this issue, save for the odd disc like this one.
Another weird one is A Tale of Two Sisters, which is 1080i/29.97. That really does have additional judder and interlacing artefacts.