Had a few hours last night.
Used -
LOTR Special Edition R1 (most of the scenes).
Unbreakable R1 (the bit as shown at The Event, where SLJ wheels down the dark corridor to the phone followed by BW going into the train station to touch people).
Jeepers Creepers R1 (any scene with open contryside, a lot of grass blowing in the wind etc, and the bit in the drain, lots of light to dark and back again).
13th Warrior R2 (lots of detail in this film. Anyone with a bitrate reader on this player will confirm that it was made with a lot of bits).
Just to note, Primare may well be bringing out a new player soon that would be of better comparison the the 88+.
The Arcam uses a Zoran MK 5 chipset (if that is correct), very new and brilliant. The Primare has a C-Cube Ziva 3 chipset. From the odd search, this chipset is also used in kit like the Meridian 800. So even though it's older, it's by no means a slouch. It now has a newer verion 5, that if Primare do release a newer player, that's what I'd expect to find in it.
The Arcam seems more natural looking with a normal colour to it. Detail is excellent. The picture is also rock solid stable. Audio is spot on too.
The V25 is much richer in its colour rendition. Almost like RGB is on a TV set. Very full. I had to turn my pj colour setting to cool to compensate a bit. There was the odd moment of shimmer in Jeepers Creepers. When they stop for a wee in a field, the car 'wobbled'. Also when they did a drive down a long, heat soaked road, the grasses all looked blurred, whereas the Arcam did a much better job of showing it. Another bit when she stood by the front of her car, the grill on the front 'shimmered' a touch with the V25.
Dark scenes were pretty much identical. My wife thought the Arcam was better at that, but I couldn't see any difference.
Close ups on the V25 for some reason looked better on the V25. People's faces were better.
As for audio, I couldn't really say. I haven't tried music as it's a cinema only system, but I will when I get a chance. Overall I'd say the sound is pretty much the same, but if I had to judge, I'd say the V25 was better. Will know more tonight.
The V25 I have 'looked' like it had PAL prog enabled. My dealer wasn't sure, but if that was interlaced, then wow! The 13th Warrior looked really good indeed all the way through. I can't say I saw any problems with it at all. For pal prog, it gets the thumbs up from me. The Arcam is also as very good. In this one though, I'd probably vote for the V25. I'll try the film again tonight on both to double check.
One irritating thing the V25 did was go a bit colour 'streaky' when you came out of pause or play from fast forward. Only for a second or two, but the Arcam was flawless.
One area the V25 walks all over the Arcam is in its rack presence. I mean it's a slab of design that shames the Arcam, no doubt. For me, that earns it points. If I (as I hope to maybe do), end up with Primare pre/power kit, this player would really make Mr. Average jealous. It screams high quality, high end, 'I'm better than thou'!! It'd finish off the kit nicely. The Arcam is nice, but more functional. They should employ the Primare designers, because they'd sell a bucket loads more players.
This all based on about 3 hours playing about.
I only use prog scan outputs directly to my Panasonic AE100 pj.
The differences between my Pioneer 737 (now sold) and the Arcam were slight. But between the Arcam and V25, much more apparent. As to which one you'd prefer.....?
So far, technically the Arcam is ahead. Better all rounder. Ironically, I really want to prefer the Primare.
This one may be a case of go with your head or heart.