| all-in one receiver or separates, which will be better
I currently own a pioneer sc-lx71 receiver, it is nice, but not precise and powerfull enough for me and my setup (B&W XT 5.1, 45 square meters living room, pioneer 600M plasma). Also i would like to get a decent videoprocessor for HD(1080I sources) and DVD.
I am on a bit of a budget (3000 GPBs), and i am considering the follwing set-ups(second-hand or demo):
all-in-one:
-arcam avr600
-Denon avc-a1hda(importing a denon 5308CI from te states)
-yamaha z11
-pioneer lx90 susano(could have been perfect, but no videoprocessing through hdmi, and don' t like the sound of class D amps)
seperates:
audiolab 8000 AP+ arcam p7/parasound halo a52+calibre vantage HD2(no hd-audio decoding, higher jitter, great price, would leave me money for a better videoprocessor, a second had calibre vantage hd2 or crystalo 2 3100)
arcam av9+arcam p7+ dvdo edge(matching set, but no audio through hdmi)
rotel 1570+ 3x rotel 1552 stereo amps/arcam p7/halosound halo a52+dvdo edge.(hd-audio decoding, 1.3 hdmi, don't lijkke the class D amps, option is 3x stereo amps(1552) class a/b
Marantz 8003AV+Marantz 8003MM+ Dvdo edge.
Anthem d2(with hdm 1.3 board installed, imported from the states)+arcam p7/halosound a 52, (no hd-audio decoding, but no need for a videoprocessor, great videoprocessor on-board)
Seperates sound very tempting instead of one all-in receiver, the denon gets killer reviews though and has great videoprocessing. The yamaha z11 and arcam avr600 too (not as good as the denon on videoprocessing).
Would the seperates i mentioned be better for SQ on music and movies than the denon, yamaha or arcam? or should i get higher rated seperates to beat these receivers?
Last edited by Halo_master; 08-11-2009 at 11:37 AM.
|