 |
|
06-02-2008, 10:12 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Exeter
Posts: 219
Thanks: Gave 19, Got 5
|
small sub for 3.5m w x 3.5m d 2.5m h room
with these dimensions ( 3.5m w x 3.5m d 2.5m h ) and a fair bit of furniture probably going to driven by cambridge audio 540r and a set of kef 2005.2 sats.
i have been looking at either the bk minotaur, bk gemini,rel quake or the
mj acoustics pro50 mk11.
budget wise the minotaur comes up trumps and seeming as i have paper thin walls and incredibly angry old neighbours...  i am drawn to this one. i dont want MASSIVE earth shaking bass( well not yet anyway...)
just decent,punchy deep room filling bass.
will the minotaur be enough? or should i go up one?
|
|
|
|
06-02-2008, 11:47 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,157
Thanks: Gave 58, Got 74
|
Re: small sub for 3.5m w x 3.5m d 2.5m h room
I would go for the Gemini ratrher then the minotaur for a few extra quid you get a lot more power.
Really though if you have angry old neighbours dont bother getting any as there is nothing worse than having to listen to your neighbours tv.
__________________
Have you ever danced with the devil in the pale moonlight?
My A/V setup
|
|
|
|
06-02-2008, 12:20 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 622
Thanks: Gave 1, Got 9
|
Re: small sub for 3.5m w x 3.5m d 2.5m h room
see my thread -I have got the bug and maybe upgrading to a large sub.
I have a Pro 50 and its is great -but not a huge sound.
I turn it up for DVD's and certainly notice the impact, and have it a bit lower for music and again adds bass.
Its in black and in perfect unmarked condition -was just thinking whether to sell or use in another room when read your thread. Let me know if you maybe interested.
Gareth
|
|
|
|
06-02-2008, 2:11 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The Fen Edge
Posts: 6,450
Thanks: Gave 352, Got 850
|
Re: small sub for 3.5m w x 3.5m d 2.5m h room
Quote:
Originally Posted by mredvers
with these dimensions ( 3.5m w x 3.5m d 2.5m h ) and a fair bit of furniture probably going to driven by cambridge audio 540r and a set of kef 2005.2 sats.
i have been looking at either the bk minotaur, bk gemini,rel quake or the
mj acoustics pro50 mk11.
budget wise the minotaur comes up trumps and seeming as i have paper thin walls and incredibly angry old neighbours...  i am drawn to this one. i dont want MASSIVE earth shaking bass( well not yet anyway...)
just decent,punchy deep room filling bass.
will the minotaur be enough? or should i go up one?
|
If you're prepared to shell out Pro 50MkII money (£300?) then get an XLS-200 at £289 which kicks the arse of anything on that list.
If a sub is too loud, simply turn it down and also remember that better quality subs distort less, which also tends to annoy neighbours less.
Russell
__________________
Mitsubishi HC6000, 88" Carada Criterion, PS3, Sky HD, Yamaha DVD-S1700, Audiolab 8000CD, 8000AP, 8000M (x2), 8000P, Rotel RB-985 MkII, XTZ 99.25 (x3), M&K Xenon 25 Surround & LCR25, BK Monolith DF, SMS-1.
My Blog. HT Piccies. Before You PM Me.
|
|
|
|
06-02-2008, 9:13 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Exeter
Posts: 219
Thanks: Gave 19, Got 5
|
Re: small sub for 3.5m w x 3.5m d 2.5m h room
thanks for replies!!
yeh not really sure i can afford to shell out over £200 on a sub at the moment.
i was hoping to go second hand,but am steering toward the gemini if i have to go new.
seems like a much better idea than shelling out the extra on a pretty similar model (mj acoustic pro50 mk11)
gareth..
i may well be interested in your pro50 if the price is right.
do you have a thread for the sale?
is it a mk 11 ? whats the difference between a mk1 ?
|
|
|
|
06-02-2008, 9:15 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Exeter
Posts: 219
Thanks: Gave 19, Got 5
|
Re: small sub for 3.5m w x 3.5m d 2.5m h room
p.s. russ.will
is the xls -200 a front firing setup?
im really after downward firing purely down to 4 probing toddler hands
they have already squished two speaker dust caps (hence my decision on wall mounted kef 2005.2 eggs 
|
|
|
|
06-02-2008, 9:23 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 886
Thanks: Gave 68, Got 123
|
Re: small sub for 3.5m w x 3.5m d 2.5m h room
Yes and No
They do both (look on the BK site for pics)
__________________
Samsung LE40M87BD | Onkyo TX-SR875 | SVS SBS-01 | SVS PB13U | Virgin V+ | Panasonic DMR-EX75EB | Xbox 360 & HDDVD Addon | PS3 | Toshiba HD-EP35 | Behringer DSP1124P | Marantz CD63SE
|
|
|
|
06-02-2008, 9:29 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Burscough, Lancs
Posts: 480
Thanks: Gave 79, Got 28
|
Re: small sub for 3.5m w x 3.5m d 2.5m h room
Quote:
Originally Posted by mredvers
im really after downward firing purely down to 4 probing toddler hands 
|
If you have twins then I would definitely go for the Gemini 
__________________
Linn: 3x Chakra 6100, 2x Majik 140, Akurate 225 centre, 2x Komponent 110, 2x Komponent 104. Also: Marantz AV8003 pre/pro, BK Monolith DF, Rega P7 T/T, Panasonic BD55, Toshiba EP35, Sky HD, HTPC, Sanyo Z2000 projector, Themescene HD3000 scaler, Beamax 84" fixed screen.
|
|
|
|
06-02-2008, 9:48 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Exeter
Posts: 219
Thanks: Gave 19, Got 5
|
Re: small sub for 3.5m w x 3.5m d 2.5m h room
hee hee not twins. one 2 and the other 8 months.
so got allot more probing to come.
i would hate to come home to punctured sub driver 
|
|
|
|
06-02-2008, 10:17 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 622
Thanks: Gave 1, Got 9
|
Re: small sub for 3.5m w x 3.5m d 2.5m h room
Quote:
Originally Posted by mredvers
thanks for replies!!
yeh not really sure i can afford to shell out over £200 on a sub at the moment.
i was hoping to go second hand,but am steering toward the gemini if i have to go new.
seems like a much better idea than shelling out the extra on a pretty similar model (mj acoustic pro50 mk11)
gareth..
i may well be interested in your pro50 if the price is right.
do you have a thread for the sale?
is it a mk 11 ? whats the difference between a mk1 ?
|
PM sent
|
|
|
|
06-02-2008, 10:49 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The Fen Edge
Posts: 6,450
Thanks: Gave 352, Got 850
|
Re: small sub for 3.5m w x 3.5m d 2.5m h room
The MkI is the Minotaur, the MkII has a bigger driver and a little more power IIRC.
If second hand is Ok and £200 is the limit, then I'd definitely keep an eye on the forum classifieds. The XLS-200 looses a few funky features, but is basically the same as the MJ Ref 200, which retails for £750.
If you can find the BK second hand, it's a no brainer. Either Pro 50 is a fart box in comparison.
Patience is a virtue, although as Mr. Impulsive, I'm probably the last person to listen to.
Russell
__________________
Mitsubishi HC6000, 88" Carada Criterion, PS3, Sky HD, Yamaha DVD-S1700, Audiolab 8000CD, 8000AP, 8000M (x2), 8000P, Rotel RB-985 MkII, XTZ 99.25 (x3), M&K Xenon 25 Surround & LCR25, BK Monolith DF, SMS-1.
My Blog. HT Piccies. Before You PM Me.
|
|
|
|
06-02-2008, 11:19 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Exeter
Posts: 219
Thanks: Gave 19, Got 5
|
Re: small sub for 3.5m w x 3.5m d 2.5m h room
these forums definitely seem the best place to pick up bargains.
especially if your patient and put the time in to look regularly.
still not convinced on a front firing sub though...(blasphemous i know)
i may hold out for a gemini to come around.
|
|
|
|
06-02-2008, 11:21 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Rushden
Posts: 6,682
Thanks: Gave 562, Got 487
|
Re: small sub for 3.5m w x 3.5m d 2.5m h room
Quote:
Originally Posted by mredvers
these forums definitely seem the best place to pick up bargains.
especially if your patient and put the time in to look regularly.
still not convinced on a front firing sub though...(blasphemous i know)
i may hold out for a gemini to come around.
|
As mentioned above, you can get both FF and DF versions of the XLS200 MKII.
|
|
|
|
06-02-2008, 11:22 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Exeter
Posts: 219
Thanks: Gave 19, Got 5
|
Re: small sub for 3.5m w x 3.5m d 2.5m h room
uhhh i just realised what you meant! i stupidly assumed it was both front and rear firing on the same unit.
hmmm now thats interesting!

|
|
|
|
| |