 |
|
|
13-10-2006, 3:33 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Prominent Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Yorkshire
Posts: 3,116
Thanks: Gave 190, Got 282
|
Cost vs Quality of HDMI cable?
Hello
When I've wanted reasonable quality cables with analogue video I've used IXOS for componet/VGA etc.
With HDMI cables being for digital signals is it really necessary to spend £30-£85+ or will ones of ebay costing less than £10 do for 1-2m lengths?
Apart from physical things such as build quality won't the signal be just as good.?
I have read a fair few opinions but there can be a lot of snobbery in cables sometimes and recently bought a cheap £3 1m TOS optical cable for SKY+ to surround sound system and can't imagine how paying 10x more could be any better.
Last edited by psikey; 13-10-2006 at 3:35 PM.
|
|
|
|
13-10-2006, 5:23 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Prominent Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Thames Valley
Posts: 4,530
Thanks: Gave 162, Got 395
|
Re: Cost vs Quality of HDMI cable?
Take a look at this comparative review in PC World magazine of HDMI cables at a range of prices.
Their conclusion?
Quote:
|
Once you get a good HDMI connection, our tests indicate, you can expect flawless performance from any 4-meter cable, regardless of price.
|
|
|
|
|
13-10-2006, 8:28 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 12,279
Thanks: Gave 701, Got 823
|
Re: Cost vs Quality of HDMI cable?
The Molex cables are fine.
__________________
Do everything with excess, even excess
|
|
|
|
13-10-2006, 9:43 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Prominent Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Yorkshire
Posts: 3,116
Thanks: Gave 190, Got 282
|
Re: Cost vs Quality of HDMI cable?
Thanks for replies.
|
|
|
|
13-10-2006, 9:56 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 809
Thanks: Gave 23, Got 37
|
Re: Cost vs Quality of HDMI cable?
Flawless suggests no problems or issues, as there can be with HDMI. If you have a high quality source and high quality display, then you can see an improvement when spending £50-£100 on a quality 1-2m HDMI cable.
|
|
|
|
14-10-2006, 8:16 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,093
Thanks: Gave 68, Got 178
|
Re: Cost vs Quality of HDMI cable?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom996
Flawless suggests no problems or issues, as there can be with HDMI. If you have a high quality source and high quality display, then you can see an improvement when spending £50-£100 on a quality 1-2m HDMI cable.
|
And your evidence for that claim is what?
Have your measured the error rate on these fancy cables? Have you conducted blind ABX testing on them?
|
|
|
|
14-10-2006, 9:04 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Assured Advertiser
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Borders
Posts: 9,761
Thanks: Gave 78, Got 701
|
Re: Cost vs Quality of HDMI cable?
Hello psikey
On short runs (sub 5m) a Molex HDMI cable will do everything you require of an HDMI cable if your looking to 'transport' any signal up to 720p or 1080i.
On short runs (sub 5m) a Molex HDMI cable 'may' do everything you require of an HDMI cable if your looking to 'transport' a 1080p signal; though Molex don't certify the cable with 1080p.
On short runs (sub 5m) a BetterCables Silver Serpent Reference 1080p HDMI cable will do everything you require of an HDMI cable if your looking to 'transport' any signal up to and including 1080p.
The key factor with the low cost cables is finding a manufacturer who produces consistent quality from batch to batch - Molex do.
Best regards
Joe
__________________
The Media Factory - Install, Connect and Control.
|
|
|
|
14-10-2006, 10:40 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Prominent Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sunny Cornwall
Posts: 3,554
Thanks: Gave 29, Got 247
|
Re: Cost vs Quality of HDMI cable?
If it works then the PQ will be as good as you can get.
If it doesn't work the picture will be very blocky, or no picture.
Digital ........ it works ....... or it doesn't
|
|
|
|
14-10-2006, 5:49 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Prominent Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Yorkshire
Posts: 3,116
Thanks: Gave 190, Got 282
|
Re: Cost vs Quality of HDMI cable?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Fernand
Hello psikey
On short runs (sub 5m) a Molex HDMI cable will do everything you require of an HDMI cable if your looking to 'transport' any signal up to 720p or 1080i.
On short runs (sub 5m) a Molex HDMI cable 'may' do everything you require of an HDMI cable if your looking to 'transport' a 1080p signal; though Molex don't certify the cable with 1080p.
On short runs (sub 5m) a BetterCables Silver Serpent Reference 1080p HDMI cable will do everything you require of an HDMI cable if your looking to 'transport' any signal up to and including 1080p.
The key factor with the low cost cables is finding a manufacturer who produces consistent quality from batch to batch - Molex do.
Best regards
Joe
|
Do you sell the Molex 1m. If so, how much inc. p&p.
All I need it for is to connect my Sony Bravia 32V2000 (1080i max) to my Sony HTSS1000 surround amp pass through output which takes two HDMI inputs.
|
|
|
|
14-10-2006, 6:12 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Assured Advertiser
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Borders
Posts: 9,761
Thanks: Gave 78, Got 701
|
Re: Cost vs Quality of HDMI cable?
Hello psikey
The Molex HDMI cables I'd recommend are 2m, 3m and 5m - they do have a 1m cable though its a thinner cable and not as good.
Best regards
Joe
__________________
The Media Factory - Install, Connect and Control.
|
|
|
|
14-10-2006, 9:33 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Prominent Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Thames Valley
Posts: 4,530
Thanks: Gave 162, Got 395
|
Re: Cost vs Quality of HDMI cable?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom996
Flawless suggests no problems or issues as there can be with HDMI. If you have a high quality source and high quality display, then you can see an improvement when spending £50-£100 on a quality 1-2m HDMI cable.
|
If something is flawless, as in entirely without flaw or imperfection, then how can a cable improve it.... 
|
|
|
|
15-10-2006, 7:16 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Midlands
Posts: 13,671
Thanks: Gave 717, Got 1,539
|
Re: Cost vs Quality of HDMI cable?
Quote:
Originally Posted by psikey
Do you sell the Molex 1m. If so, how much inc. p&p.
|
Joe is one of too few retailers that respects the forum rules so I would suggest that you contact him directly for a quote, either by PM, email or telephone.
__________________
Ian
Opinions expressed by myself are not necessarily those of AV Forums
|
|
|
|
15-10-2006, 10:56 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Assured Advertiser
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: East Yorkshire, England
Posts: 2,479
Thanks: Gave 19, Got 102
|
Re: Cost vs Quality of HDMI cable?
Quote:
Originally Posted by psikey
Hello
With HDMI cables being for digital signals is it really necessary to spend £30-£85+ or will ones of ebay costing less than £10 do for 1-2m lengths?
|
Hello Psikey,
The ebay cable might work just fine, although check the ebay prices as many ebay sellers will sell you a cable for 1 pence and then charge £7 to £10 delivery charge for something that costs about £1 to post
The reason is simple, many really cheap HDMI cables made in China etc are untested, the first person that tests the cable is the customer.
if you return faulty stuff to ebay sellers they wont refund the post, just the 1 pence for the cable etc. (extreme example I know...)
Also really cheap cables sometimes have poorly fitting HDMI connectors not exactly built to HDMI spec, so are a little bit loose in the sockets and fall out easily etc.
At least one brand of HDMI cables has had problems with failure rates as high as 25% , thats a lot of people wanting refunds.
I suggest as others have that molex are great for the price for short lengths.
Never had a faulty Molex HDMI returned here yet
Mark.
__________________
markgrantcables.co.uk --- Highest quality products and service --- Cables and other tweaky bits - Genuine UK business ( Assured Advertiser)
|
|
|
|
15-10-2006, 11:17 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Assured Advertiser
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: East Yorkshire, England
Posts: 2,479
Thanks: Gave 19, Got 102
|
Re: Cost vs Quality of HDMI cable?
Quote:
Originally Posted by loz
Take a look at this comparative review in PC World magazine of HDMI cables at a range of prices.
Their conclusion? Once you get a good HDMI connection
|
The key words there are Good connection
not all cables have the same connector quality, digital connections are not all the same if the connector falls out
Thats a good article, although they have only tested short cables at 720P with a signal generator to just one projector.
signal generators (good ones) have a much 'cleaner' output than budget HDMI players, as I have seen myself with my own HDMI test gear, a cable that works with a signal generator does not always work when you try it with a DVD player in a real installation. (usually at long lengths though)
Would be nice to see some unbiased tests of long cables, with various DVD players and plasmas etc, with a few kinks and bends/ corners in the cables as would happen when installed in ceilings etc.
Mark.
__________________
markgrantcables.co.uk --- Highest quality products and service --- Cables and other tweaky bits - Genuine UK business ( Assured Advertiser)
|
|
|
|
15-10-2006, 11:40 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Re: Cost vs Quality of HDMI cable?
I think that many people underestimate the psychological effect of buying expensive vs cheap HDMI cables. If you have spent many thousands on an AV system, there is a large part of you that says 'I should spend a little more on the cable'.
This is certainly the case with myself. I accept the fact that a digital signal either works or it does not, but I have still bought only premium HDMI cables -the reason: I can't live with the nagging doubt that I could have done better than a freebie or £20 cable - i.e. the 'what if?' factor. Unfortunately this is the reason why the expensive cables exist.
Therefore I don't think we should vilify people who would rather buy a QED, Ixos, Chord etc. cable.
Unfortunatley after buying one of Mark's mains cables, my previously staunch stance of the uselessness ofthese has been shaken a little 
|
|
|
|
| |