View Full Version : Worst recording ever ?
slingshot
26-04-2002, 10:35 AM
Don't know if this ones been done before, but what's everyones worst CD/LP/DVD for recording and production (rather than musical content) ?
I've got a couple of really horrible recordings :-
1 - Red Hot Chilli Peppers - californication, I really love the music by the production is terrible, the guitars sound horribly distorted in the treble, which might be OK but who's ever heard of distorted cymbals ?
2 - Travis - the man who - I'll admit I hate the music on this one aswell, but again there's a real harsh edge to a lot of the guitars and sometimes the vocals, my HiFi seems to show this problem more than some other setups, but I can still hear it on the car stereo aswell.
3 - Holst the planets DTS5.1 CD - just can't cope with the strange recording of this, what are those violinists doing sitting behind me, every time I try and put it on I end up reching for my old vinyl stereo copy.
Anyway anyone else got some music that deserves throwing away.
MarkB
26-04-2002, 11:44 AM
3 - Holst the planets DTS5.1 CD - just can't cope with the strange recording of this, what are those violinists doing sitting behind me, every time I try and put it on I end up reching for my old vinyl stereo copy.
Doh, and I've ordered this. Which version is it? Andre Previn?
Doesn't your amp allow dts 5.1 stereo downmix to 2.0 stereo?
Originally posted by slingshot
1 - Red Hot Chilli Peppers - californication, I really love the music by the production is terrible, the guitars sound horribly distorted in the treble, which might be OK but who's ever heard of distorted cymbals ?
got to agree with you there.....you can't even turn the volume up, otherwise distortion goes mad!!!
Bert Coules
26-04-2002, 12:10 PM
Originally posted by slingshot
Don't know if this ones been done before, but what's everyones worst CD/LP/DVD for recording and production (rather than musical content) ?
A friend of mine has an elderly LP of Beethoven piano music. Just a couple of seconds after the very first track starts, the pianist makes a mistake. He stops, practices the opening a couple of times, pauses then starts again. It's all there on the record. The producer (if there was one) must have been asleep, deaf or woefully ignorant.
The sound quality, however, is excellent...
Bert
http://www.bertcoules.co.uk
slingshot
26-04-2002, 1:14 PM
Originally posted by MarkB
Doh, and I've ordered this. Which version is it? Andre Previn?
Doesn't your amp allow dts 5.1 stereo downmix to 2.0 stereo?
It was the LSO version, I think was Previn but I'm not sure, a couple of friends like it, however I'm a bit of a vinyl freak anyway so probably a bit biased. I just found some of the high frequency stuff from the rears too distracting.
Anyway hope you enjoy it and I haven't put you off.
Slingshot
Garrett
26-04-2002, 2:09 PM
I have a CD of The Planets conducted by Andre Previn but mine is with the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra.
I had a LP recording with the Sir Malcolm Sargent conducting the BBC Symphony Orchestra. which is or was superior, only one day I was playing it on my dads deck and the arm decided to move right across the record from the end of Mars to Jupiter, via Venus and Mercury, it must be the longest scratch on a record ever.
Originally posted by Bert Coules
He stops, practices the opening a couple of times, pauses then starts again. It's all there on the record. The producer (if there was one) must have been asleep, deaf or woefully ignorant.
The sound quality, however, is excellent...
Bert
http://www.bertcoules.co.uk
many years ago, when they made a record, they actually cut the grooves "live". If there was one mistake, they either scrapped it and started again, or just kept going....no post-production editing in those days.
I've no idea how much "blank" records were at the time, but maybe it was down to cost and / or available.
Bert Coules
26-04-2002, 5:20 PM
Originally posted by mjn
many years ago, when they made a record, they actually cut the grooves "live". If there was one mistake, they either scrapped it and started again, or just kept going....no post-production editing in those days.
Oh no, this was well into the LP-vinyl, tape-editing era.
Bert
http://www.bertcoules.co.uk
john87
01-05-2002, 5:46 PM
One of the worst I have heard (note the I part) is
Oasis - What's the Story (Morning Glory)
For such a good album it sounds nasty!
Originally posted by slingshot
It was the LSO version, I think was Previn but I'm not sure, a couple of friends like it, however I'm a bit of a vinyl freak anyway so probably a bit biased. I just found some of the high frequency stuff from the rears too distracting.
Anyway hope you enjoy it and I haven't put you off.
Slingshot
Slingshot ,
No, I still love the music.
I have heard that The Planets is now to be released in full blown DVD-Audio format by dts. I'm not sure which version though.
Mark
Glasswalker
02-05-2002, 10:00 AM
The production on Anthrax's first offering 'A Fistful of Metal' is lack lustre. But then again early thrash metal always suffered from being badly produced. Still a damn fine record though.
Darth Vader
04-05-2002, 11:27 PM
Originally posted by Glasswalker
The production on Anthrax's first offering 'A Fistful of Metal' is lack lustre. But then again early thrash metal always suffered from being badly produced. Still a damn fine record though.
Early 70's Heavy Metal wasn't very well recorded either. Take the first few Black Sabbath albums 'Black Sabbath' and 'Paranoid' for example. They were recorded on shoe string budgets in no time at all. But managed to spawn a whole new genre of music. Which lead to thrash metal and other genres.
But as you say "still damn fine records though".
Regards.
I recently purchased Paul Wellers Acoustic disc which sounded dreadfull.
Chip
General Skanky
07-05-2002, 3:39 PM
My worst disc is Annie Lennox - Diva. Low levels with distortion crashing in on the peaks. Nice.:grin:
juboy
08-05-2002, 11:46 AM
Quite simply, any album by The Misfits.
Every album is basically your worst 4 track cassette demo lovingly re-created onto CD.
Such a shame that such great songs are obscured by such appalling sound quality.
common
08-05-2002, 12:25 PM
I recently bought a copy of 'Best of Country Line Dancing' by Mick Nashville Lloyd. I have to say that I was very disappointed in the quality of the recordong (particularly disc 3, track 14: (If You're Not in It for Love) I'm Outta Here! )
Disc 3 - you mean there is a collection of country line dancing that is carried over 3 or more discs - I'm horrified
To be honest I do not feel that CD is any superior in quality anyway
You need a new CD player my friend
juboy
08-05-2002, 12:36 PM
"You need a new CD player my friend"
Or maybe just new ears?
"I have a huge collection of Country and Western Music Cassettes (started collecting in 1981 whilst on holiday in Texas) which are my pride and joy, and I feel it would be almost impossible to replace them all with CD. To be honest I do not feel that CD is any superior in quality anyway."
Are you seriously suggesting that 20+ year old cassette tapes could be of higher quality than CD?
By all means somebody correct me if I'm wrong here, but assuming the same source is used to master a recording, isn't cassette tape technically the very WORST quality hi fi format there is?
gringottsdirect
08-05-2002, 6:29 PM
juboy,
Ignoring convenience factors, I feel CD is possibly the worst hi-fi format for actually listening to your favourite music.
I have many 20 year old cassettes that still sound as good as when they were new.
Vinyl is still tops with me.
john87
10-05-2002, 3:18 PM
I have many 20 year old cassettes that still sound as good as when they were knew. What is knew? When did CD ever sound any worse after 20 years of listening to it? :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
some people here must be winding us up...
the problem with cassettes is the that the actual tape stretches over time, well after around several dozen listens.....and this effects the quality of the sound.
Andbody that says the cassette is better than CD, needs some help!!
mjn: I have to agree. Put even a well recorded cassette tape next to a TV, unshielded speakers or even on a windowsill with sun coming through and you'll notice your tape sounds bloody awful after 20 minutes let alone 20 years :)
Unless you physically scratch a CD with a sharp object it'll sound just like it did 20 years ago (although, to be fair, there weren't too many CDs around exactly 20 years ago!).
In fact, as the surface protection contaminents and shine of the edges wear off, there's a chance CDs could actually sound *better* as they get older.
Garrett
10-05-2002, 4:30 PM
I believe you also can get print through? after a length of time i.e. as one layer of tape sits next to the other it affects it.
yes, i've heard that one aswell...
not the mention, the actual tape, starts to corrode aswell, and starts splitting up, ie the metal starts to fall away.....very nice.
General Skanky
10-05-2002, 4:41 PM
Tape sounds worse, full stop.
I've still got a nice collection and played a few the other day, and they were terrible. Dull, undynamic and lifeless.
Vinyl however is still King. Even though I stopped using my deck in favour of CD, it is still far superior. CD can be very, very good indeed, but doesn't quite achieve what a good record can.
Iancity
10-05-2002, 6:51 PM
Worst for me (and it shows the diversity of music I listen to) Pavarotti, the Gold collection 40 classic performances of songs that I am embarrassed to put back on the cd, and DIO, The best of, this is so awful I cannot even listen to it on my car cd!! It stinks, in fact I have just tried to get it out to remind me how bad it was but can't find it - hopefully I chucked it!
gringottsdirect
10-05-2002, 7:52 PM
john87,
I didn't say my CDs sound worse after twenty years, only that I have cassettes that still sound well.
I had my first Sony CDP-101 player in March 1983, my first discs came free, Journey, Elton John and Billy Joel. I sat with anticipation as Don't Stop Believin' from the Journey album Escape began. After all the pre-launch excitement I was horrified, it sounded awful. I followed it with Blue Eyes by Elton John, "Perfect Sound That Lasts Forever", not.
I tried other players, strange shapes and sizes, Philips, Marantz and Hitachi. They were almost as bad. Decided that I couldn't enjoy Compact Disc yet.
Almost twenty years later I am happy to say the same three discs from way back now sound terrific, the players are totally better as you might expect.
However, I can still enjoy cassettes recorded back then more than say, the latest Sheryl Crow album, C'mon, C'mon, based on sound quality alone, CDs are still not as good as quality analogue.
Maybe this is where SACD or DVD-Audio triumphs, but I don't care for the multi-channel remixes, I am a bit tired of Tubular Bells, but I remember it was originally a four channel possibility.
I have lots of 8 track cartridges too, anyone for "The Best Of Bread" in Quadraphonic, now that is better than cassette! :blush:
Journey rock, regardless of format:)
gringottsdirect
11-05-2002, 12:19 AM
juboy,
Journey are one of my favourites, along with Blue Oyster Cult...
juboy
11-05-2002, 10:57 AM
I have all the Journey albums on vinyl along with the Steve Perry solo album... 'Raised On Radio' still sounds amazing even now.
'Shooting Shark' by BOC is one of my all-time favourite tracks... I have the 7" vinyl of that too!
gringottsdirect: have you ever listened to the band 'Starz'? Very underrated band, I reckon you'd like them.
gringottsdirect
11-05-2002, 8:05 PM
juboy,
Shooting Shark, - tops!
I'll investigate Starz...
Thanks.
Every Oasis album on my system !
infomatique
21-05-2002, 2:30 PM
Originally posted by juboy
[B
By all means somebody correct me if I'm wrong here, but assuming the same source is used to master a recording, isn't cassette tape technically the very WORST quality hi fi format there is? [/B]
In 1979 I was a Quality Manager with Memorex Media Products and we were involved in the manufacture and duplication of Audio Cassettes due to the quality of the tape used for duplication coupled with the fact that recordings were transferred at high speed (thus removing much high frequency information) pre-recorded cassettes could not be described as being good quality.
Because of problems associated with magnetic print through etc. it is most unlikely that a twenty year old (unused tape) would be as good as the day it was purchased on the otherhand if a tape was used on a regular basis there would be problems relating to tape wear such as channel imbalance due to scratching resulting from oxide build-up. There is also a tendency for the tape to stretch and distort and problems resulting from chemicals used in the binder.
About five years ago I was involved as a Quality Consultant with one of the largest CD manufacturing operations in the World and while the general quality of CDs may be getting worse because of low cycle times and very little profit margin (for the replication plant) there is no way that pre-recorded tapes could be considered to be as good as CDs.
infomatique
21-05-2002, 2:43 PM
Originally posted by General Skanky
Tape sounds worse, full stop.
I've still got a nice collection and played a few the other day, and they were terrible. Dull, undynamic and lifeless.
Vinyl however is still King. Even though I stopped using my deck in favour of CD, it is still far superior. CD can be very, very good indeed, but doesn't quite achieve what a good record can.
I had a very large vinly collection but the problem was that it was getting more and more difficult to get properly manufactured product ... companies were using excessive regrind or releasing ultra-thin pressings (RCA produced anti-warp LPs which warped the minute you purchased them) and coloured disks lacking essential lubricants. I switched to CDs as soon as they became available and was fairly happy until about four or five years ago. For various commercial reasons the quality standards are reducing just as new products (SACD and DVD-Audio) are becoming available. It is possible the SACD might be superior to Vinyl.
john87
21-05-2002, 6:24 PM
CDs are still not as good as quality analogue I've never heard one person say that before... it cannot be debated - CD is way ahead of tape in terms of sound quality.
From a frequency response point of view alone, i would have thought a twenty year old cassette would be fairly ropey. And this was in he days when the Nakamici Dragon and the Aiwa ADF 770 were the kings of the cassette deck field.
As for the worst recordings..Anything out of the Musicland Studio in Germany produced by Mack.
The man had a knack of making recordings of bands that had a previously good track record (pardon the pun) of high quality crisp recording and managed to get them to sound dull and lifeless, with a very hissy sound and weak flabby drums.
ELO, Queen and even The Sweet suffered at his hands.
From a frequency response point of view alone, i would have thought a twenty year old cassette would be fairly ropey. And this was in the days when the Nakamici Dragon and the Aiwa ADF 770 were the kings of the cassette deck field.
As for the worst recordings..Anything out of the Musicland Studio in Germany produced by Mack.
The man had a knack of making recordings of bands that had a previously good track record (pardon the pun) of high quality crisp recording and managed to get them to sound dull and lifeless, with a very hissy sound and weak flabby drums.
ELO, Queen and even The Sweet suffered at his hands.
infomatique
21-05-2002, 9:01 PM
Originally posted by john87
I've never heard one person say that before... it cannot be debated - CD is way ahead of tape in terms of sound quality.
I assume that you mean "cassette" rather than "tape" ...
CDs are digital and by definition some information is lost during the process and there are many other problems relating to sample rate etc. so by definition CD has to be inferior to to the analogue source. A lot of CDs have been produced using analogue tape masters which are very much superior to the resulting mass produced CD. What I am disputing is the claim that pre-recorded cassettes are as good as CD ... I am sure that this is what you meant as well.
Rachael Bitchlist
22-05-2002, 6:39 AM
EARTHBOUND by King Crimson. It was recorded on an Ampex cassette recorder live with two mic's. Every so often the sound is TOTALLY red-lined into complete distortion. I don't mind garage music and primative recording. I often tire of today's computer "perfect" muzak. EARTHBOUND is an intresting snapshot of how KC sounded in Peoria one night (and a couple of other dates actually), but it's recording is ill even by garage standards.
I think it's fair to say that when most people use the term 'tape' they do mean 'compact cassette tape' rather than DAT or studio grade reel-to-reel tape.
This was certainly what I was referring to when I made the statement that, as far as I'd always been led to believe, cassette tape is the lowest quality hi fi music format there is.
On the pre-recorded cassette tape issue, when I was a kid I bought a few and they were universally terrible. I always figured tapes were basically an advert for eventually buying a record (be it on vinyl or CD). You'd get an idea of the band or the music and then if you thought you liked it and wanted to hear it properly, you'd go buy the other formats.
I still don't believe that 'Home taping is killing music' rubbish... if anything it stimulates sales of music.
infomatique
22-05-2002, 9:07 AM
Originally posted by juboy
I still don't believe that 'Home taping is killing music' rubbish... if anything it stimulates sales of music.
I totally agree with this comment.
Unfortunately the record companies are too mean to admit this.
gringottsdirect
24-05-2002, 8:01 PM
I can't see anyone can defend pre-recorded "musicassettes", even when they were new they were uniformly rubbish regardless of the playback machine.
The first one I bought was Bert Kaemphart and Orchestra, the second was Goodbye Yellowbrick Road - Elton John, the third was Diamond Dogs - David Bowie. Then never again.
For making your own recordings before minidisc and CD-R we had the "help" of Dolby C (then Dolby S) and DBX. I have copied every tape onto minidisc or CD-R over the last year or so. We know the problems with tape ageing so I have copied it all.
It was whilst doing the transfers I was struck by how good most of them still sound.
DBX recordings had -30db of noise reduction but had breathing effects, but even so.
"Is It Live Or Is It Memorex?"
Remember it well...
I would imagine many of you will not know this tune, but my
vote for the worst recording goes to:
JVC Force - Strong Island...
Tremendous track, but sounds like it's been produced in a shed.
Adzman
Californication, horrible recording. Nearly unplayable on a good system, passable on a bad.