 |
|
|
31-05-2006, 8:40 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 129
Thanks: Gave 1, Got 0
|
Which is best-TopfieldTF5800 or Digifusion FVRT200?
Hi,
Which is the best Freeview PVR - The Topfield TF5800 or Digifussion FVRT200?
Regards
Alien1x
|
|
|
|
31-05-2006, 9:12 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Prominent Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 4,364
Thanks: Gave 88, Got 233
|
Topfield. No question.
|
|
|
|
01-06-2006, 1:34 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 246
Thanks: Gave 2, Got 5
|
The Digifusion has known quality issues. Mine packed up last week with similar symptoms to many others on this hallowed portal. No response yet received to my email sent to Fusion last week. Its now been replaced with a Humax which, so far, seems very good, although the manual is rubbish.
Whatever you get, avoid the Digifusion.
|
|
|
|
01-06-2006, 6:47 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Somewhere in South Yorkshire
Posts: 8,642
Thanks: Gave 178, Got 695
|
Topfield: Hardware robust, software pretty stable, features second to none, especially if you customise it with freely available add-on software (TAPs).
Fusion: Stable and forgiving software; hardware probably not very robust, but my suspicion is that many failures are overheat related due to installations with insufficient ventilation
Humax: Software is not as stable as Fusion and is lacking some fairly standard PVR features; fixes are promised, but are slow in coming
__________________
Nigel
Except on matters of forum moderation, the views expressed in this post are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of AVForums.
|
|
|
|
01-06-2006, 8:41 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 161
Thanks: Gave 2, Got 11
|
If you have the ability to update it with taps then the topfiled is probably more flexible.
If you want something that works out of the box, then the fusion is probably a more friendly solution.
BTW: I have had a fusion for about 2 years now and its still working fine. A friend has a topfield and is very happy with it aswell.
|
|
|
|
01-06-2006, 10:25 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Reading
Posts: 407
Thanks: Gave 18, Got 19
|
I don't think you can say that the Topfield is best "without question" (rhubarbe) - it really depends what the requirements are on the machine.
I've had a Digifusion FVRT150 for about 18 months now without any major problems - the odd lock up cured by restarting, but that's about it. Although it's not extensible in the same way as the Toppy, it's benefit is that it's very easy for the whole family to use.
I also bought a FVRT145 (? - the Argos one) for my grandparents recently after their video starting going wrong. Despite being almost 90, they're using it like pros now and haven't had any problems.
I've never used the Topfield, and don't know anyone with one, so can't really comment on it, but if you just want an easy-to-use, hassle-free, video replacement, the Digifusion is well worth considering.
Balders.
|
|
|
|
01-06-2006, 10:53 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: London E7 UK
Posts: 1,773
Thanks: Gave 16, Got 149
|
The digifusion 200 (but not I believe the other fusions) has aspect ratio switching problems. A friend has one and have seen the problems myself; not on many channels but annoying. What is really annoying is that digifusion obviously have SoftWare cure but have not released it.
Richard
__________________
System 1 Panny TX-36PF10; Topfield PVR; Arcam DV88; Musical Fidelity X-A100R; Yamaha DSP800; Castle Harlech; Rega Planar 3; MF ; X-24K DAC; phono amp; headphone amp; & XPSU ; Sennheiser HD600; Harmony 885
System 2 LG Flatron MW-30LZ10, Topfield PVR; LG Video/DVD combo; Yamaha RX-SL80. Harmony 655
|
|
|
|
01-06-2006, 2:51 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Somewhere in South Yorkshire
Posts: 8,642
Thanks: Gave 178, Got 695
|
Is IS annoying, and the wait for a fix is frustrating. But, like the other "bugs" with the Fusion, it is fairly easily worked around and isn't fatal to the recording.
__________________
Nigel
Except on matters of forum moderation, the views expressed in this post are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of AVForums.
|
|
|
|
01-06-2006, 3:21 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Approaching the doghouse at great speed
Posts: 659
Thanks: Gave 68, Got 109
|
And as has been said a few times by others,at least the FVRT200 can be reasonably relied on to record a program in the first place
__________________
I would be unstoppable,if only I could get started.
Pioneer 435XDE/PDP-26,Denon 2910/2805,Digifusion FVRT200,Monitor Audio S6/S2/SLCR,REL stampede,Wireworld/Van Den Hul/QED cabling,Italian Spinone dog hair
|
|
|
|
01-06-2006, 5:50 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 199
Thanks: Gave 2, Got 4
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Drd
And as has been said a few times by others,at least the FVRT200 can be reasonably relied on to record a program in the first place
|
True. However, other than failed hardware support, there have been no (that's zero, nada, rien, b* all) software updates for this model since it was released almost a year ago and it looks pretty certain now that there aren't going to be any (even the vague "soon" promisies we've been hearing almost monthly since last September have died away to silence now).
So whilst it sort of does what it says on the tin, the compressed/extended play doesn't work (crashes the machine) - which I'm surprised they can get away with under Advertising Standards regulations - the left/right audio is reversed and it can't display 14:9 - so forget about ITV3 & 4 and some BBC and C4/E4 programming unless you like your pictures squashed!
--awhb
|
|
|
|
01-06-2006, 8:40 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Prominent Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 4,364
Thanks: Gave 88, Got 233
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by balders
I don't think you can say that the Topfield is best "without question" (rhubarbe) - it really depends what the requirements are on the machine.
|
Sure, I know2 there are people who like the Fusion a lot. But the questiom was which is best.
My family can all use the Toppy like falling off a log (we don't run any TAPs and have never felt we needed to, so let's knock that old chestnut on the head).
If they want a film archiving to DVD I just move ot to the PC via USB and burn it.
Flexible, reliable, easy to use, rock solid hardware, frequent factory FW updates and third party software development: Nigel & co at www.toopy.org.uk.
Want more?
|
|
|
|
01-06-2006, 9:16 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 129
Thanks: Gave 1, Got 0
|
Hi,
Posted this question after being confused reading -reviews in various AV mags.The latest review gave the Digifussion top marks, but online forums give the Toppy good marks.
All I want is a freeview box that can record with plenty of options, the ability to transfer to DVD etc. But I rather by the best which will last for years to come and cope with changing technogy.
Its either a freeview PVR (the best) or Sony 910 HDD+DVD.
Regards
Alinex
|
|
|
|
01-06-2006, 9:22 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Prominent Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 4,364
Thanks: Gave 88, Got 233
|
Doesn't that Sony:
1 Only have one digital tuner?
2 Cost a fortune?
I shouldn't take much notice of airy-fairy magazine reviews. Go rather with the opinions of the guys that actually have paid out their own hard cash. There's nowt like having spent some brass to concentrate the mind.
|
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 8:20 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 161
Thanks: Gave 2, Got 11
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by awhb
So whilst it sort of does what it says on the tin, the compressed/extended play doesn't work (crashes the machine)
|
Now thats simply not true. I've used compression before on the 200 and it didn;t crash the box. My other 150 has compression set to lots of recordings and has never crashed.
|
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 9:34 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Somewhere in South Yorkshire
Posts: 8,642
Thanks: Gave 178, Got 695
|
From what I read, use of compression CAN in some cases, cause corruption on the HDD which the Fusion reacts to by wiping the entire thing. However, it's easily worked around; just don't use it. For this reason, I never use EP or LP on mine.
__________________
Nigel
Except on matters of forum moderation, the views expressed in this post are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of AVForums.
|
|
|
|
| |