Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jigesh
Edit: Thanks, Exirion. I read your edited post which answers my question on the number of DACs/ADCs. Thank you.
Now the question comes to my mind is: Can a single-chip solution affect overall channel separation in the sound field? I am asking this because almost everyone who has this prepro raves about its two-channel performance compared to the HT performance; probably because less the number of channels in a single-chip solution, less the inter-channel interference/cross-talk (if any).
|
After some googling I found out that the Arcam AVR300 uses the WM8770, which is a multi-channel DAC/ADC with volume control. Another option, but less likely, is the WM8768. Pretty sure the AVP700 uses the WM8770 as well.
I own a CD73 CD player and the performance of the AVP700 in the analogue domain is very satisfactory. I use the CD73 with analogue connections. Sound is good and so is the stereo image. If it sounds the same with the XLR outputs I'm very happy.
I think you can endlessly debate about the whole "discrete vs integrated" issue. The truth is that integrated solutions have become much better through the years, so I guess resistence against integrated components is also a matter of psychology
I bought the AVP700 as an upgrade after a NAD T-163 A/V processor. Stereo music has the highest priority for me, but having fully seperated setups for stereo and multi-channel A/V was a bit too radical. I consider the AVP700 a very good trade-off
