AVForums.com is the UK's biggest & best home consumer electronics discussion resource


Go Back   AVForums.com > Home Electronics > Digital Cameras, Photography and Photo Editing

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13-06-2005, 1:29 PM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire
Posts: 30
iTrader: (0)
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Advice on which Firewire CF Reader

I would be most grateful if anyone has any advice on which Firewire CF Card Reader i should get, to get the pictures off my Canon 300D, fast and reliably
pgayler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 5:26 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
mr jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: (S)cumbria, UK
Posts: 1,037
iTrader: (0)
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 22
does it have to be firewire???

i bought a belkin usb2.0 CF reader for about £15 from jessops so you can probably pick them up cheaper on ebay. ive not had any problems (apart from when i installed it one of the sys files now wont allow windows to boot up with any usb2 devices plugged in, but thats not a problem as i dont tend to have it plugged in all the time anyway
__________________
Can you keep your signatures appropriate for a family forum please..

Thanks
mr jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 5:36 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
tomson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Berk'amsted
Posts: 1,441
iTrader: (23)
Thanks: Gave 44, Got 137
i had a sandisk firewire reader (imagemate i think it was)and i wasn't impressed with it - was pretty slow. I swapped it for the USB2 version and it was far better. Really noticed a difference when copying over a full 1gb card of images.
tomson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-06-2005, 10:51 AM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire
Posts: 30
iTrader: (0)
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
i presumed that a firewire reader would be faster than a usb2, form the comments it sounds like it isn't, so i guess i should look at getting a usb2 one.
How much faster will a usb2 reader be against downloading straight from the camera.
pgayler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-06-2005, 11:13 AM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
mr jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: (S)cumbria, UK
Posts: 1,037
iTrader: (0)
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 22
i found it a bit quicker, plus the advantage of not having to have the camera on, so you can charge the batteries etc
__________________
Can you keep your signatures appropriate for a family forum please..

Thanks
mr jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-06-2005, 11:36 AM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
tomson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Berk'amsted
Posts: 1,441
iTrader: (23)
Thanks: Gave 44, Got 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by pgayler
i presumed that a firewire reader would be faster than a usb2.
So did I. I did think I might have had a duff firewire reader but then I read this: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/sto...d-eraders.html and they had similar results. It was significantly faster than the no-name usb1 reader I was using previously but still was slower than I was expecting.
tomson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-06-2005, 8:06 PM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Hobart
Posts: 848
iTrader: (0)
Thanks: Gave 9, Got 41
usb2 card reader will be very much faster than straight from the camera.
__________________
Raj
Tosh XS32, Yamaha 2600 & SW350, Kef Q55.2/iQ6C, Pronto 940&890, ArcamCD, D 290 & delta2, Wadia12 DAC, Cyrus SL&XPA, Mission CD, Quad 34/606, kef ref
Canon 30D + grip, 24-70L, 70-200f4L, EF1.4xII, 28-135 IS USM, 50 1.8II, Sigma 12-24, 550EX, IXUS 950IS
dood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2005, 8:24 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Reading, Berkshire
Posts: 1,544
iTrader: (39)
Thanks: Gave 17, Got 39
If you use a laptop, a 32bit cardbus reader will be even faster still than firewire OR usb2.0
__________________
"It was about that time...."
SeaneyC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-06-2005, 11:29 AM   #9 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire
Posts: 30
iTrader: (0)
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
After reading the xbits article, i went for the Sandisk Imagemate USB 2.0, its most impressive, it took me 10 seconds to download 42 images all Large JPEGS, on average 2.5mb each, as opposed to 30 odd minutes.
Thanks for you help
pgayler is offline   Reply With Quote

Bookmarks

Tags
advice, firewire, reader


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:35 AM.

AV ForumsOptimised for Firefox.
RSS Feed
AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited.
Copyright © 2000-2009 M2N E. & O. E.
Global Gold
Web Hosting