 |
|
13-06-2005, 1:29 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire
Posts: 30
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
|
Advice on which Firewire CF Reader
I would be most grateful if anyone has any advice on which Firewire CF Card Reader i should get, to get the pictures off my Canon 300D, fast and reliably
|
|
|
13-06-2005, 5:26 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: (S)cumbria, UK
Posts: 1,037
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 22
|
does it have to be firewire???
i bought a belkin usb2.0 CF reader for about £15 from jessops so you can probably pick them up cheaper on ebay. ive not had any problems (apart from when i installed it one of the sys files now wont allow windows to boot up with any usb2 devices plugged in, but thats not a problem as i dont tend to have it plugged in all the time anyway
__________________
Can you keep your signatures appropriate for a family forum please..
Thanks
|
|
|
13-06-2005, 5:36 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Berk'amsted
Posts: 1,441
Thanks: Gave 44, Got 137
|
i had a sandisk firewire reader (imagemate i think it was)and i wasn't impressed with it - was pretty slow. I swapped it for the USB2 version and it was far better. Really noticed a difference when copying over a full 1gb card of images.
|
|
|
14-06-2005, 10:51 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire
Posts: 30
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
|
i presumed that a firewire reader would be faster than a usb2, form the comments it sounds like it isn't, so i guess i should look at getting a usb2 one.
How much faster will a usb2 reader be against downloading straight from the camera.
|
|
|
14-06-2005, 11:13 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: (S)cumbria, UK
Posts: 1,037
Thanks: Gave 6, Got 22
|
i found it a bit quicker, plus the advantage of not having to have the camera on, so you can charge the batteries etc
__________________
Can you keep your signatures appropriate for a family forum please..
Thanks
|
|
|
14-06-2005, 11:36 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Berk'amsted
Posts: 1,441
Thanks: Gave 44, Got 137
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pgayler
i presumed that a firewire reader would be faster than a usb2.
|
So did I. I did think I might have had a duff firewire reader but then I read this: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/sto...d-eraders.html and they had similar results. It was significantly faster than the no-name usb1 reader I was using previously but still was slower than I was expecting.
|
|
|
14-06-2005, 8:06 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Hobart
Posts: 848
Thanks: Gave 9, Got 41
|
usb2 card reader will be very much faster than straight from the camera.
__________________
Raj
Tosh XS32, Yamaha 2600 & SW350, Kef Q55.2/iQ6C, Pronto 940&890, ArcamCD, D 290 & delta2, Wadia12 DAC, Cyrus SL&XPA, Mission CD, Quad 34/606, kef ref
Canon 30D + grip, 24-70L, 70-200f4L, EF1.4xII, 28-135 IS USM, 50 1.8II, Sigma 12-24, 550EX, IXUS 950IS
|
|
|
15-06-2005, 8:24 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Reading, Berkshire
Posts: 1,544
Thanks: Gave 17, Got 39
|
If you use a laptop, a 32bit cardbus reader will be even faster still than firewire OR usb2.0
__________________
"It was about that time...."
|
|
|
17-06-2005, 11:29 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire
Posts: 30
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
|
After reading the xbits article, i went for the Sandisk Imagemate USB 2.0, its most impressive, it took me 10 seconds to download 42 images all Large JPEGS, on average 2.5mb each, as opposed to 30 odd minutes.
Thanks for you help
|
|
|
| |