AVForums.com is the UK's biggest & best home consumer electronics discussion resource


Go Back   AVForums.com > Manufacturer-Specific Owners' Forums > Arcam Owners' Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-2005, 1:06 AM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 58
iTrader: (1)
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Arcam A85 and P90 Configuration

I've just bought some new speakers: Monitor Audio Gold Reference 20. Monitor Audio's UK Sales Manager, Alex Brady, was very helpful in helping me choose. He actually talked me into getting the GR20s instead of the more expensive GR60s!

Anyway, he told me to do something interesting. He said to connect my Arcam P90 to the top speaker terminals and the A85 to the bottom. He gave this reason

"The top end of the speaker has more delicate detail to resolve. Configuring the P90 to the top end will give you a purer top end, with more space and air, with better imaging and soundstaging.The fact that the top set of terminals on a GR20 handle mid and upper bass too make this even more beneficial."

I've certainly noticed a difference and was wondering if anyone had experimented with this with other speakers. I still don't understand why the P90 would be better than the A85 in resolving detail.

Also, I bought my P90 after the A85 and P85 had been discontinued. I noticed that even John Dawson has posted in this forum that the P90 and P85 are electrical identical but I wonder how this can be. The continuous power output per channel for the P85 is 85W and for 90W for the P90. How much difference does this make when using a P90 with an A85?

Look forward to hearing your views.

Many thanks,

Rupesh
DistortedVision is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2005, 6:32 AM   #2 (permalink)
Distinguished Member
 
Crustyloafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 7,145
iTrader: (45)
Thanks: Gave 132, Got 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by DistortedVision
Also, I bought my P90 after the A85 and P85 had been discontinued. I noticed that even John Dawson has posted in this forum that the P90 and P85 are electrical identical but I wonder how this can be. The continuous power output per channel for the P85 is 85W and for 90W for the P90. How much difference does this make when using a P90 with an A85?
The slight difference in power outputs will not make any difference as they both have the same gain levels. The slighly higher power output increase is probaly due to one or two minor component changes internally but in essence the P85 is basically the same as a P90.
Crustyloafer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2005, 5:49 PM   #3 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: 49°15'56"N/123°8'4"W
Posts: 67
iTrader: (0)
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by DistortedVision
...Anyway, he told me to do something interesting. He said to connect my Arcam P90 to the top speaker terminals and the A85 to the bottom. He gave this reason...
I would most definitely (at least) try the other way around. Here is why:

LF, which you are currently driving with A90, is more current demanding, meaning it is taxing the power supply more. The power supply in A90 is shared between amp and preamp section and a high current demand from amp section can compromise its power supply to preamp section.
The other disadvantage that I see is that you have to use interconnects for HF instead the shortest possible path in the preamp. The longer the signal path – the more chances for distortion (and IMO it’s way easier to hear distortion in HF).
mrkeeling is offline   Reply With Quote

Bookmarks

Tags
a85, arcam, configuration, p90


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:35 AM.

AV ForumsOptimised for Firefox.
RSS Feed
AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited.
Copyright © 2000-2009 M2N E. & O. E.
Global Gold
Web Hosting