AVForums.com - View Single Post

10-06-2003, 2:42 AM

I guess if the source is natively 100hz- ie a PC video card, then having the display at that refresh is the best way of doing it.

However having the source at 50hz and trying to make the display 100hz by interlopating is a inferior way of doing it.

The only solution then is replacing PAL & NTSC with PAL 100hz and NTSC 120hz (say doubling the currrent system) say should then help TV engineers just use the native input refresh, not trying to design the internals of a TV to increase a lower refresh source.

10-06-2003, 2:42 AM	#8
nathan_silly Guest Posts: n/a	I guess if the source is natively 100hz- ie a PC video card, then having the display at that refresh is the best way of doing it. However having the source at 50hz and trying to make the display 100hz by interlopating is a inferior way of doing it. The only solution then is replacing PAL & NTSC with PAL 100hz and NTSC 120hz (say doubling the currrent system) say should then help TV engineers just use the native input refresh, not trying to design the internals of a TV to increase a lower refresh source.
	Quote