AVForums.com - View Single Post

**LV426** · 12-02-2003, 1:46 PM

There are advantages of LCD over Plasma.

1: Life. The only part that 'wears' is the backlight, which Sharp claim has 60,000 hours life (more than you are ever likely to need)

2: Complete absence of any refresh-rate flicker

3: Complete absence of 'screen burn'.

And, as LCDs go, I reckon that the Sharps are some of the best I've seen - mainly because of the extremely wide viewing angle - much better than the (more expensive) Panasonic (comparing the 22in models).

12-02-2003, 1:46 PM	#4 (permalink)
LV426 Super Moderator Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: Somewhere in South Yorkshire Posts: 9,270 My movie collection Thanks: Gave 465, Got 946	There are advantages of LCD over Plasma. 1: Life. The only part that 'wears' is the backlight, which Sharp claim has 60,000 hours life (more than you are ever likely to need) 2: Complete absence of any refresh-rate flicker 3: Complete absence of 'screen burn'. And, as LCDs go, I reckon that the Sharps are some of the best I've seen - mainly because of the extremely wide viewing angle - much better than the (more expensive) Panasonic (comparing the 22in models). __________________ Nigel Except on matters of forum moderation, the views expressed in this post are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of AVForums.