View Single Post
Old 15-08-2002, 10:13 AM   #14
Nic Rhodes Nic Rhodes is offline
Illustrious Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cumbria
Experience Points:
48,568, Level: 53
Points: 48,568, Level: 53 Points: 48,568, Level: 53 Points: 48,568, Level: 53
Activity: 1.1%
Activity: 1.1% Activity: 1.1% Activity: 1.1%
Thanks: Gave 884, Got 1,285
Posts: 17,038
Quote from Joe Kane, godfather of video

“……..It is often accomplished by converting the incoming component signal to S-Video, then sending that signal to their standard decoder chip. Believe it or not, this is a common practice, not only among TV set manufacturers, but in several video upconverters. There is a picture quality loss going from component to S-Video then back to component inside the old processor chip. This is usually what’s going on in the video system when reviewers proclaim S-Video equal to component video.”

Now I have ‘researched’ this subject more I am of the opinion that this is common practice at the very least. I am also VERY suspicious that some may even process in composite. And you all thought it was simple……

As I said before, buyer beware or at least be educated. It may well be that all the high resolutions signals (component / RGB) get down converted to S Video (or composite?) internally and the differences we see are down to engineering and connectors. Poor old Scart…..The more I look into this subject the worse it gets.

The Snell & Wilcox Zone Plate test pattern on Video Essentials will help people investigate this further if they are as sad as me.