View Single Post
Old 23-01-2011, 8:10 AM   #128
phil t phil t is online now
Senior Member
phil t's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ashford, Surrey
Thanks: Gave 48, Got 163
Posts: 1,795
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonic67 View Post
So given that that makes you at least marginally better qualified than Raszcak would you say that a Polaris missile would have been impossible for us at any point to be fired at Argentina?
Sonic, I left the Royal Navy in October 2008.

I spent 22 years in the submarine service and 12 of those within the Trident program. I am well aware of the intricacies of a missile launch and as an ex navigation supervisor I’m also aware of all the data required for a launch.

I never served on Polaris boats, but know that the polaris missile system required the same data as trident.

As you’ll understand, I was and am still bound by the official secrets act. I can never prove to you that Polaris couldn’t “hit” Buenos Aires, because that proof would mean discussing information that is well above Top Secret. As has been said, Trident and Polaris before it, wasn’t like a mortar. Yes, a boat could have sat off the coast of Argentina, but firing its missiles is something else altogether.

 
Thanks from:
Phil57 (23-01-2011), Rasczak (23-01-2011)