View Single Post
Old 29-05-2010, 5:42 PM   #9
Bibby_83 Bibby_83 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hull
Experience Points:
6,923, Level: 19
Points: 6,923, Level: 19 Points: 6,923, Level: 19 Points: 6,923, Level: 19
Activity: 1.1%
Activity: 1.1% Activity: 1.1% Activity: 1.1%
Thanks: Gave 194, Got 139
Posts: 2,150
Quote:
What is the SI unit for betterness?

It is subjective and can't be measured.
True, I was just surprised at the relative cost of SACD Players and the gap between them although I think there might be differences. I agree that it might not necessarily be better but at this price I would expect some improvements to the sound.

Quote:
I also compared the SA-15S2 to the SA8003, which is still two rungs up from the CD7001. The difference was vast. The SA8003 sounded muddy, greatly lacking detail but also musicality in comparison. I assume the KI Pearl is a further step up, but having not heard it I can't tell you how much it differs.
Apparently the 8003 is similar to the 7001KI (DAC etc.) but I have to say I've never heard either of them. Both the SA-15 and SA-7 belong to the Ref series and I would expect the chassis and component quality to show through.

Last edited by Bibby_83; 29-05-2010 at 5:51 PM.
  Quote